Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #305Re: Dell memory upgrade and why so expensive?
From: Edward J. Neth
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:16
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:16
44 lines
3387 bytes
3387 bytes
The system does need low-density RAM - 16 chips for a 256 MByte module - which is why it costs more. Most RAM these days is high density - it costs more to produce modules with twice as many low-density chips, which is why you see higher prices for older systems like the XPS-T, -R, and 4100. Bottom line - you need a 16-chip, non-ECC, CL-2 DIMM for these systems. There are only two sockets, 512 MBytes max between the two. "Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:brfeh3$2p5iq$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de... > G'day mates, > > For some time I've been considering bunging some more memory into my > 128MB Dell Dimension 4100 (1.1GHz version), but every time I look it's > about twice the price of "normal" 168-pin PC133 non-ECC CAS 3 SDRAM.. > > On top of that, the Australian prices are arithmetically two > (Kingston) or three (Crucial) times the US prices for Dell SDRAM > whereas on current USD<>AUD they should be more like 35% higher > numerically. [US Kingston is more expensive than Crucial, hence that > "two or three".] > > Finally, there's the issue of double/single sided SDRAM which confuses > the possibility of using something generic rather than the "special" > (is it so special?) Dell stuff from Kingston/Crucial etc., because I > really don't know whether Dell uses "single" or "double" and none of > the spec sheets I've found mention this distinction -- and I'm led to > believe it's not obvious to see by simple inspection, in spite of what > those names imply! > > All of which rather puts a bloke off if he's not too confident with > moding hardware gear, so I'm still considering rather than doing! > > Guidance from those with experience would be most welcome, please. > > > Cheers, Phred. > > -- > ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<VsKCb.36301$jg4.20010@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!elnk-atl-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr32.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!b29ccceb!not-for-mailReferences:
<brfeh3$2p5iq$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,f4f176ef35d6f6ab X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,f4f176ef35d6f6ab X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-13 12:17:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!elnk-atl-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr32.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!b29ccceb!not-for-mail From: "Edward J. Neth" <ejn63@netscape.com> Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers References: <brfeh3$2p5iq$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Dell memory upgrade and why so expensive? Lines: 46 Organization: . X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <VsKCb.36301$jg4.20010@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.252.4.107 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr32.news.prodigy.com 1071346613 ST000 64.252.4.107 (Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:16:53 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:16:53 EST X-UserInfo1: Q[OYBYSEABTSP_PXKBNXKQ@@AZJJBQ\KCA_@LWQIMASTUSAANNTEAK_ZQL[^HVWKGFDWJ@^NJ^[D_DKBRFW]NVHG@^RQXS\HJ@X^B_KBETUD@EP_XC@NIQKASLEE[KJMML^CJIZM\YYWWICSELXINHC_FK^XWQKIHA[Y@@OB@CCRA_LEY\FLLQ\GXVUKQPBL Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:16:53 GMT