Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #386Re: Good Indian support experience
From: Oldus Fartus
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 02:19
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 02:19
75 lines
5284 bytes
5284 bytes
In news:bgcgk4$ndng5$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de, Thomas M. Goethe <goethe11@lycos.com> wrote these words: | "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message | news:bgbp43$lvgua$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de... || ||| ||| Though there have been pushes to switch to Hindi, || || It was always the official language since independance. || ||| that change || || There is no change with the official language. | | There are actual several official languages if I recall | correctly. Just did some research on a local Hindu Temple and was on | a web page that listed the official languages. Hindi and Tamil are | apparently the two major ones. By coicidence I was helping one of my grandchildren do some research on this subject recently, so had the information at hand. From http://www.indianchild.com/linguistic_states_india.htm "As drafted, the constitution provided that Hindi and English were to be the languages of communication for the central government until 1965, when the switch to Hindi was mandated. The Official Languages Act of 1963, pursuing this mandate, said that Hindi would become the sole official national language in 1965. English, however, would continue as an "associate additional official language." After ten years, a parlia-mentary committee was to consider the situation and whether the status of English should continue if the knowledge of Hindi among peoples of other native languages had not progressed sufficiently. The act, however, was ambiguous about whether Hindi could be imposed on unwilling states by 1975. In 1964 the Ministry of Home Affairs requested all central ministries to state their progress on the switch to Hindi and their plans for the period after the transition date in 1965. The news of this directive led to massive riots and self-immolations in Tamil Nadu in late 1964 and early 1965, leading the central government, then run by the Congress (see Glossary), to back away from its stand. A conference of Congress leaders, cabinet ministers, and chief ministers of all the states was held in New Delhi in June 1965. Non-Hindi-speaking states were assured that Hindi would not be imposed as the sole language of communication between the central government and the states as long as even one state objected. In addition any of the Scheduled Languages could be used in taking examinations for entry into the central government services." Further on, and interestingly the article has this to say "Only around 3 percent of the population (about 28 million people in 1995) is truly fluent in both English and an Indian language. By necessity, a substantial minority are able to speak two Indian languages; even in the so-called linguistic states, there are minorities who do not speak the official language as their native tongue and must therefore learn it as a second language. Many tribal people are bilingual. Rural-urban migrants are frequently bilingual in the regional standard language as well as in their village dialect. In Bombay, for example, many migrants speak Hindi or Marathi in addition to their native tongue. Religious celebrations, popular festivals, and political meetings are typically carried on in the regional language, which may be unintelligible to many attendees. Bilingualism in India, however, is inextricably linked to social context. South Asia's long history of foreign rule has fostered what Clarence Maloney terms "the linguistic flight of the elite." Language--either Sanskrit, Persian, or English--has formed a barrier to advancement that only a few have been fortunate enough to overcome." http://rajbhasha.nic.in/dolruleseng.htm gives the full text of the relevant Act, including which language is to be used, and when. -- Cheers Oldus Fartus.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bgcimv$2d91$1@otis.netspace.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.netspace.net.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<tqJVa.2027$mr1.637@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net> <bga498$mokok$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgbfl9$n5j7p$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgbp43$lvgua$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgcgk4$ndng5$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108c83,a8ffb6fc98773241 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,1c812b70eb8b99f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-31 19:19:13 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.netspace.net.au!not-for-mail From: "Oldus Fartus" <denisand@netNOSPAMspace.net.au> Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers Subject: Re: Good Indian support experience Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:19:17 +0800 Organization: Netspace Internet Lines: 77 Message-ID: <bgcimv$2d91$1@otis.netspace.net.au> References: <tqJVa.2027$mr1.637@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net> <bga498$mokok$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgbfl9$n5j7p$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgbp43$lvgua$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de> <bgcgk4$ndng5$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl-202-45-119-72.wa.netspace.net.au X-Trace: otis.netspace.net.au 1059704352 79137 202.45.119.72 (1 Aug 2003 02:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@otis.netspace.net.au NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 02:19:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165