Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #512Re: Pentium Or Pentium Pro
From: Lawrence Kirby
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 00:00
56 lines
3274 bytes
3274 bytes
In article <4rkkhn$54@natasha.rmii.com> underwoe@rmii.com "Edmond" writes: >Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>Certainly, they are 32 bit applications even running under DOS (they use >>32 bit DOS extenders). Only things like disk I/O have o use 16 bit code >>and CPU speed isn't particularly relevat there since it is waiting for the >>disk most of the time. >> > >32-bit doesn't mean that you are using a flat memory model. In theory no. In practice with current OSs and extenders that is exactly what is means. > The latter is >just as important as using 32-bit registers for data. Segmented memory >causes you to subvert the branch prediction model of the P-PRO which >causes all sorts of processor stalls apparently. That and register aliasing are the main things that have given the Ppro a bad name for 16 bit apps. 32 bit code give you more flexibility in the use of registers and until a 4GB address space ceases to be adequate code can use a 'small' memory model. >>>And wait for a >>>Pentium Pro built version of Quake for NT 4.0 with Xdirect video and >>>sound. >> >>The only reason an NT version would run faster in normal play is if it >>were able to use some of the features of the graphics/sound cards better. >>This is relevant but not a 16 vs 32 bit code issue. > >Not exactly. If the drivers and the graphics API are all fully 32-bit, >you'll get better performance from the 32-bit versions. Win95 uses 16-bit >graphics (and some video/sound drivers are still 16-bit), so your doomed >to slowdom on a Pentium PRO. Possibly for some of the control functions but those should have insignificant overhead anyway. Access to the screen memory is 32 bit. Under DOS I would expect it to deal with VGA modes directly, with possibly some 16 bit calls for VESA modes. > WinNT 4.0 would give you much superior >graphics performance under the PRO. I doubt whether the difference would be noticable, possibly not even measurable except, as stated above, where it is able to take better advantage of the graphics/sound card features. -- ----------------------------------------- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com -----------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<836755380snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4rc02h$oq2@cronkite.cisco.com> <4rc1oh$osd@news2.cais.com> <31D9B338.2F17@ix.netcom.com> <836482613snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <4rkkhn$54@natasha.rmii.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4d34,b16f4f368be3dd2c X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d34,public X-Google-Thread: faca2,b16f4f368be3dd2c X-Google-Attributes: gidfaca2,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,b16f4f368be3dd2c X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-Thread: 1019d9,b16f4f368be3dd2c X-Google-Attributes: gid1019d9,public From: Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Pentium Or Pentium Pro Date: 1996/07/07 Message-ID: <836755380snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 164157334 x-nntp-posting-host: genesis.demon.co.uk references: <4rc02h$oq2@cronkite.cisco.com> <4rc1oh$osd@news2.cais.com> <31D9B338.2F17@ix.netcom.com> <836482613snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <4rkkhn$54@natasha.rmii.com> x-mail2news-path: genesis.demon.co.uk organization: none reply-to: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,alt.sys.pc-clone.micron,biz.marketplace.computers.pc-clone