Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #97Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID
From: Tom Scales
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:09
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:09
120 lines
5126 bytes
5126 bytes
no, it's not. The pricing between the series is different. Oh, to heck with it. You don't get it. "Count Blah" <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in message news:fBmra.663212$L1.189148@sccrnsc02... > The question is do you want a specific Dell series or do you want a specific > chipset/MB? > > "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net> wrote in message > news:Mcmra.3563$P%6.2889@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com... > > What is there, the XPS with 800FSB or the 8300. I think we all knew about > > the XPS. The question is whether the 8300 is available with the 800FSB. > > > > Tom > > "Count Blah" <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in message > > news:ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02... > > > It is there. Check out new series of XPS: > > > 3.0 Ghz P4, 800Mhz FSB, 4 fans, 450Watts power... > > > > > > > > > "Robert Johnson" <robertjohnson999@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > news:01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron... > > > > Currently the 8300 has the 530 FSB. I am waiting for the 800 FSB. > > > > > > > > Count Blah <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in article > > > > <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53>... > > > > > I'm with you Marcos. I've placed my order on the discounted 8250 > with > > > > 2.8Ghz > > > > > on few days ago and cancelled it. Although it had a very good price > I > > > > found > > > > > the following reasons to lean towards 8300: > > > > > > > > > > - RDRAM is twice more expensive and has to be installed in pairs (so > I > > > > will > > > > > have only ONE expensive upgrade in the future); > > > > > - RDRAM will probably be abandoned in the future because newest > Intel > > > > > chipsets support DC DDR SDRAM; > > > > > - Video slot is 8X AGP on 8300 vs. 4X on 8250. Which means that best > > > > video > > > > > cards will not be used to their full potential on 8250 in the > future. > > > > > - 3.06 GHz with HT; > > > > > > > > > > I'm still not sure if the 8300 has 530Mhz or 800 Mhz front side bus > > > > speed. > > > > > Any info on that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Marcos M. Zattar" <zattar@t-online.de> wrote in message > > > > > news:b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com... > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > > > I am planning to buy a desktop from DELL and until yesterday I > > didn't > > > > > > have any doubt, I was up to the Dimension 8250. But then Dell > > launched > > > > > > a new model here in Germany, the 8300. It claims to be faster > > because > > > > > > it has the chipset 875P and 533/800 Mhz PSB. Besides, the RDRAM > was > > > > > > replaced by the DDR. To make the choice more complicated, the 8300 > > is > > > > > > offered here in Germany with a regular hard-disk or optionally > with > > a > > > > > > RAID couple instead (stripe or mirror, you choose). So here my > > > > > > questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > - How much is the increase in performance with the new chipset and > > RAM > > > > > > type? Is it worth spending those extra bucks for the newer > version? > > > > > > - What are the advantages of a Serial-ATA harddisk compared to a > > > > > > regular EIDE harddisk? > > > > > > - It is said that RAID 1 (mirror) is safer regarding a possible > disk > > > > > > failure and RAID 0 (stripe) is faster. How safer is RAID 1 and how > > > > > > faster is RAID 0? Is there really a considerable chance that in a > > RAID > > > > > > 0 system one of the disks fails, breaks or has a malfunction? In > > this > > > > > > case, is it true that you lose all your data? > > > > > > > > > > > > I would appreciate any comments that would help me decide which > one > > to > > > > > > get. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye! > > > > > > Marcos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<t3sra.10027$P%6.7933@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe03.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53> <01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron> <ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02> <Mcmra.3563$P%6.2889@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com> <fBmra.663212$L1.189148@sccrnsc02>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,e2de0a0b28bc5c97 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,e2de0a0b28bc5c97 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-29 03:10:11 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe03.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net> Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers.ibm-pc References: <b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53> <01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron> <ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02> <Mcmra.3563$P%6.2889@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com> <fBmra.663212$L1.189148@sccrnsc02> Subject: Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID Lines: 122 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123 Message-ID: <t3sra.10027$P%6.7933@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:00:57 EDT Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:09:42 -0400