Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000
Article #261Gateway GP6-233 with PD440FX motherboard - memory problems
From: mjdalways
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00
67 lines
3286 bytes
3286 bytes
(Sorry if this a repost I messed up the group names in Deja!) Hi, I own a Gateway GP6-233 computer with a PD440FX motherboard and 32MB of Samsung memory. The Samsung memory is identified as fully tested and working with the machine (KMM5324104BK-6). Its specs are as follows (according to the Samsung part number decoder http://www.usa.samsungsemi.com/buy/decoder/dramsimm.htm): 72pin DRAM SIMM 4Mx32 2K EDO 60ns Tin >7chips I want to add another 128MB (2 64MB SIMMs) and found that the following Samsung memory also works: KMM53216004AK-6 (as shown in http://www.intel.com.sv/design/motherbd/pd/pd_mem.htm) 72pin DRAM SIMM 16Mx32 4K EDO 60ns Tin >7chips it is a non-parity 5V chip. Not wanting to spend more than I need to I found a deal on generic memory for $61.49 (http://www.asr-online.com/asr-online/memory.html) the only caveat was that it was high-density and required a 4k refresh rate and double sided. Given the Samsung KMM53216004AK-6 specs and the intel memory spec for the PD440FX the generic memory seemed to be 100% compatible. However after receiving and installing the memory the following happened: First the machine booted and showed just 64MB of ram before writing some small pixels to the lower left side of the screen. I went into setup and found that the bios (AMI 1.00.01.DT0T - Gateway specific no upgrades available) recognised 160MB. But windows wouldn't boot and my CD-RW was not recognised. So I removed the old memory and checked the new memory was in place and rebooted. This time the screen corruption was more noticeable and the BIOS would not go into setup mode. Plus the harddrive was not recognised. Fearing the worst I remove the new memory and replaced the old memory, to find that everything was fine (once I told the machine that yes I has lost 128MB :( ). I have now returned the generic memory for the major brand memory (costs another $100 but maybe this will work!). My questions are: 1) Why did the generic memory not work? 2) Is there a limit to the memory recognised by the memory counter on bootup? 3) Should the major brand memory work (given that the generic memory and the Samsung and the major brand all have identical specs)? Thanks in advance, Mark Donoghue. --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7hheq4$95e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bf1a,d1870f84657c4a52,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf1a,public X-Google-Thread: f9d87,d1870f84657c4a52,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf9d87,public X-Google-Thread: faca2,d1870f84657c4a52,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfaca2,public From: mjdalways@hotmail.com Subject: Gateway GP6-233 with PD440FX motherboard - memory problems Date: 1999/05/14 Message-ID: <7hheq4$95e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Deja-AN: 477841134 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 SRNPTPROXY1, 1.0 bx6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 199.66.15.253 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 14 15:17:26 1999 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,intel.microprocessors.pentium_ii,intel.motherboards.pentium_ii