🚀 go-pugleaf

Steven Whitlatch (swhitlat@gray.nmt.edu) wrote:

: |> Does anyone have benchmark numbers with and w/o the optional cache,
: |> or with 128k vs. 256k?  Is it really worth the extra ~$250?

: 	I recall the Zeos techs telling me that the performance 
: 	increase would amount to about 10 per-cent in ms-windows,
: 	if WinTach were used.

: 	I'm interested in what kind of benefit I'd be getting 
: 	in X under Linux and XFree.  

: 	Anyone from Zeos reading this?

   It is ZEOS policy that we do not quote benchmarks on our systems.
We leave benchmarking to third parties (such as magazine reviews).  I
can say that the more CPU intensive your application, the more benifit
you will get from installing a cache.  If you are using disk intensive
applications, a CPU cache will not increase your performance as much.

-- 
David Mortenson         |                        | ZEOS International, Ltd.  
support@zeos.com   INET | Any opinions expressed | Technical Support Dept.
uunet!zeos!support UUCP |   herein are my own    | 1301 Industrial Blvd N.E.
612-633-4607       FAX  |                        | Minneapolis, MN 55413