Article View: alt.usage.english
Article #4602Re: Source of American Acronynms and Initialisms
From: Stuart R. Leichter
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00
48 lines
2931 bytes
2931 bytes
In article <51ruji$ec0@news.inforamp.net>, tom collins <tcollins@inforamp.net> wrote: [clipped a fine analysis] > But I doubt if any country will ever match the American style > to the degree this practice exists there. The U.S., as a "country" is e pluribus unum. One can expect that the European Economic Community will find plenty to be brief about as well. Dr. McLuhan had noted how our phonetic alphabet had divorced language from nature, and how electric technology especially had revived the mythic "all-at-onceness" quality of preliterate or tribal experience. McLuhan suggested that a myth explains in an instant a rather complex process that occurs over a long period of time. We might include the possibility that acronyms and initialisms developed as a linguistic response to the preference "in our time" for the cool medium. LED is cool; light emitting diode is hot. I guess I'm trying here to shore up Tom's "launching pad" idea with a Canadian theorist's idea. After all, McLuhan places the electric mythic/tribal threshold at Morse's telegraph (c. 1844), and we all know what dot dot dot dash dash dash dot dot dot spells and means; but I (for one) have no idea what it stands for. It's an acronym or initialism without a "content," as the electric light, according to McLuhan, is a medium without any content: it's "pure information." So, relying on McLuhan (whom I miss terribly), I would add that our proliferation of acronyms and intitialisms derives from our unconscious mythic and tribal awareness. Brevity, instant recognition, incomplete detail, and mass awareness are the telltale signals that the medium is the message. I think "disk operating system" is now invariably only an answer to a very ingenuous question. Nothing aside, but the Cabalistic linguists hold that the Hebrew of Genesis (for instance) consists of the equivalent of acronyms, where each letter itself is a word (in the sense that we use these terms today). And of course the word "alphabet" itself should remind us that acronyms existed long before the word "acronym" was coined. Although Essex and Sussex are very old, non-American acronyms, perhaps the use of "U.S." "U.K." and "U.S.S.R." (even in Russian an initialism) was also fuel on the launching pad. Dunno, but hope the thread grows. -- Stuart R. Leichter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<sleichte-2009961806590001@wheat-10.nb.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<51ruji$ec0@news.inforamp.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff20b,fc524d54bd42d6f0 X-Google-Attributes: gidff20b,public X-Google-Thread: 102ffd,fc524d54bd42d6f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid102ffd,public From: sleichte@nb.net (Stuart R. Leichter) Subject: Re: Source of American Acronynms and Initialisms Date: 1996/09/20 Message-ID: <sleichte-2009961806590001@wheat-10.nb.net> X-Deja-AN: 184268398 references: <51ruji$ec0@news.inforamp.net> organization: The National Business Network Inc. (localconnect(sm)) newsgroups: alt.usage.english,can.english