Thread View: alt.usage.english
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Marco Weiser
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
need help for my lecture
Author: Marco Weiser
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
19 lines
1053 bytes
1053 bytes
hello! i have to give a lecture about "the early settlement of the USA". who can help me?? the lecture is on 28.9. - so it is very urgent. please contact me per mail! thanks, marco weiser ================================= = mailto: marcoweiser@r-w.de = = http://www.r-w.de/homepages/MWeiser = =================================
Re: need help for my lecture
Author: Mark Daniels
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00
39 lines
1584 bytes
1584 bytes
I think we can refer back to the Anglo-Saxon in this context and say... Oh, I can't do it, not even on-screen. I was brought up such a polite boy. Someone else say it.. Mark D. Marco Weiser wrote: > hello! > > i have to give a lecture about "the early settlement of the USA". > who can help me?? > > the lecture is on 28.9. - so it is very urgent. > > please contact me per mail! > > thanks, > > marco weiser > > ================================= > = mailto: marcoweiser@r-w.de = > = http://www.r-w.de/homepages/MWeiser = > ================================= -- Mark Daniels Belgrade, Yugoslavia Amusing, yet soul-penetratingly pertinent sig under construction. Emailed copies welcome. Spam unwelcome. Remove XX's from email address to respond.
Re: need help for my lecture
Author: peterkr
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00
51 lines
2413 bytes
2413 bytes
In article <36086B28.E5651F18@eunet.yu>, Mark Daniels <em-ay-ar-kay-dee@eunet.yu> wrote: > I think we can refer back to the Anglo-Saxon in this context and say... > Oh, I can't do it, not even on-screen. I was brought up such a polite > boy. Someone else say it.. > > Mark D. > > Marco Weiser wrote: > > > hello! > > > > i have to give a lecture about "the early settlement of the USA". > > who can help me?? > > > > the lecture is on 28.9. - so it is very urgent. > > > > please contact me per mail! > > > > thanks, > An interesting theory is the affect of geography on the settlement of north America. Since the French landed on the continent primerily to the north, near to what would become the US-Canadian border, they had access to the Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrenece Seaway. This allowed them to easily move westward and then southward when they hit the Finger Lakes and the Ohio River. But it also caused them to form impermanent settlements. The Spanish landed primarily to the south in the Florida area. This allowed them to move easily westward along the coast, and then northward via the Mississippe. And again, they caused them to form impermanent settlements. The English, however, landed in the middle of the coast. This area had no east-west running rivers and thus movement westward was difficult, and they tended to stay where they were, forming permanent settlements. Interesting for a talk, simple to write, and not really doing the work for someone, IMO. HTH Pjk -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Re: need help for my lecture
Author: David McMurray
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00
21 lines
1455 bytes
1455 bytes
<peterkr@ms.com> wrote: [...] > An interesting theory is the affect of geography on the > settlement of north America. Since the French landed on > the continent primerily to the north, near to what would > become the US-Canadian border, they had access to the > Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrenece Seaway. This allowed > them to easily move westward and then southward when they hit > the Finger Lakes and the Ohio River. But it also caused > them to form impermanent settlements. In what sense do you consider French settlement in North America to have been "impermanent"? (And even if your general thesis has merit, I doubt that the St. Lawrence Seaway had much to do with it.) [...] -- David
Re: need help for my lecture
Author: peterkr
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00
29 lines
1954 bytes
1954 bytes
In article <1dft8nz.2boho7irn5j4N@96-g2.kingston.net>, ik0583@kingston.net (David McMurray) wrote: > <peterkr@ms.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > An interesting theory is the affect of geography on the > > settlement of north America. Since the French landed on > > the continent primerily to the north, near to what would > > become the US-Canadian border, they had access to the > > Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrenece Seaway. This allowed > > them to easily move westward and then southward when they hit > > the Finger Lakes and the Ohio River. But it also caused > > them to form impermanent settlements. > In what sense do you consider French settlement in North America to have > been "impermanent"? > Impermanent in the sense that they were set up as way- stations for further explorations and to be used as stopping-off places for trappers and traders. Impermanent to the extent that farms did not have to be established in order to live in a one area for generations. HTH Pjk -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads