🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.uu.future
Article #67

Is Esperanto Necessary

#67
From: Peter Reintjes
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 00:44
28 lines
1311 bytes
I would like to add that I too am puzzled by the
enthusiasm for Esperanto.  It seems apparent that
the lingua franca (sorry) of the Net is English.
Whether that is good or bad,  it just is.

Maybe I don't understand why you need another 
language to describe the grammar of (say) Russian.

Just describe the grammar using English words.
I don't really see why it is necessary to use
a language with a nice,  regular grammar. Even if
it is slightly preferable to do this,  it hardly
seems to outweight the overhead of learning another
language.

I know English,  French,  a little German and would
love to learn Russian.  I'm not terribly excited
about using Esperanto to do this.  My point is
that we are already using English. It is quite easy
to explain the concept of French genders using
English,  even though the English doesn't have that
characteristic.


Just my humble opinion, 

         Peter Reintjes     pbr@quine.sofla.ingr.com))
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul25.004424.26052@infonode.ingr.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!reintjes

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.uu.future
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!reintjes
From: reintjes@infonode.ingr.com (Peter Reintjes)
Subject: Is Esperanto Necessary
Message-ID: <1992Jul25.004424.26052@infonode.ingr.com>
Keywords: esperanto russian
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 00:44:24 GMT
Lines: 28