Thread View: alt.war.vietnam
26 messages
26 total messages
Started by sgtbob
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:25
Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: sgtbob
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:25
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:25
276 lines
12246 bytes
12246 bytes
A textbook definition of cowardice Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview By Keith Olbermann MSNBC The headlines about them are, of course, entirely wrong. It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. It is not important that the current President�s portable public chorus has described his predecessor�s tone as �crazed.� Our tone should be crazed. The nation�s freedoms are under assault by an administration whose policies can do us as much damage as al Qaida; the nation�s marketplace of ideas is being poisoned by a propaganda company so blatant that Tokyo Rose would�ve quit. Nonetheless. The headline is this: Bill Clinton did what almost none of us have done in five years. He has spoken the truth about 9/11, and the current presidential administration. "At least I tried," he said of his own efforts to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. "That�s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now. They had eight months to try; they did not try. I tried." Thus in his supposed emeritus years has Mr. Clinton taken forceful and triumphant action for honesty, and for us; action as vital and as courageous as any of his presidency; action as startling and as liberating, as any, by any one, in these last five long years. The Bush Administration did not try to get Osama bin Laden before 9/11. The Bush Administration ignored all the evidence gathered by its predecessors. The Bush Administration did not understand the Daily Briefing entitled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike in U.S." The Bush Administration did not try. Moreover, for the last five years one month and two weeks, the current administration, and in particular the President, has been given the greatest �pass� for incompetence and malfeasance in American history! President Roosevelt was rightly blamed for ignoring the warning signs�some of them, 17 years old�before Pearl Harbor. President Hoover was correctly blamed for�if not the Great Depression itself�then the disastrous economic steps he took in the immediate aftermath of the Stock Market Crash. Even President Lincoln assumed some measure of responsibility for the Civil War�though talk of Southern secession had begun as early as 1832. But not this president. To hear him bleat and whine and bully at nearly every opportunity, one would think someone else had been president on September 11th, 2001 -- or the nearly eight months that preceded it. That hardly reflects the honesty nor manliness we expect of the executive. But if his own fitness to serve is of no true concern to him, perhaps we should simply sigh and keep our fingers crossed, until a grown-up takes the job three Januarys from now. Except for this. After five years of skirting even the most inarguable of facts�that he was president on 9/11 and he must bear some responsibility for his, and our, unreadiness, Mr. Bush has now moved, unmistakably and without conscience or shame, towards re-writing history, and attempting to make the responsibility, entirely Mr. Clinton�s. Of course he is not honest enough to do that directly. As with all the other nefariousness and slime of this, our worst presidency since James Buchanan, he is having it done for him, by proxy. Thus, the sandbag effort by Fox News Friday afternoon. Consider the timing: the very weekend the National Intelligence Estimate would be released and show the Iraq war to be the fraudulent failure it is�not a check on terror, but fertilizer for it. The kind of proof of incompetence, for which the administration and its hyenas at Fox need to find a diversion, in a scapegoat. It was the kind of cheap trick which would get a journalist fired�but a propagandist, promoted: Promise to talk of charity and generosity; but instead launch into the lies and distortions with which the Authoritarians among us attack the virtuous and reward the useless. And don�t even be professional enough to assume the responsibility for the slanders yourself; blame your audience for �e-mailing� you the question. Mr. Clinton responded as you have seen. He told the great truth untold about this administration�s negligence, perhaps criminal negligence, about bin Laden. He was brave. Then again, Chris Wallace might be braver still. Had I in one moment surrendered all my credibility as a journalist, and been irredeemably humiliated, as was he, I would have gone home and started a new career selling seeds by mail. The smearing by proxy, of course, did not begin Friday afternoon. Disney was first to sell-out its corporate reputation, with "The Path to 9/11." Of that company�s crimes against truth one needs to say little. Simply put: someone there enabled an Authoritarian zealot to belch out Mr. Bush�s new and improved history. The basic plot-line was this: because he was distracted by the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Bill Clinton failed to prevent 9/11. The most curious and in some ways the most infuriating aspect of this slapdash theory, is that the Right Wingers who have advocated it�who try to sneak it into our collective consciousness through entertainment, or who sandbag Mr. Clinton with it at news interviews�have simply skipped past its most glaring flaw. Had it been true that Clinton had been distracted from the hunt for bin Laden in 1998 because of the Monica Lewinsky nonsense, why did these same people not applaud him for having bombed bin Laden�s camps in Afghanistan and Sudan on Aug. 20, of that year? For mentioning bin Laden by name as he did so? That day, Republican Senator Grams of Minnesota invoked the movie "Wag The Dog." Republican Senator Coats of Indiana questioned Mr. Clinton�s judgment. Republican Senator Ashcroft of Missouri�the future attorney general�echoed Coats. Even Republican Senator Arlen Specter questioned the timing. And of course, were it true Clinton had been �distracted� by the Lewinsky witch-hunt, who on earth conducted the Lewinsky witch-hunt? Who turned the political discourse of this nation on its head for two years? Who corrupted the political media? Who made it impossible for us to even bring back on the air, the counter-terrorism analysts like Dr. Richard Haass, and James Dunegan, who had warned, at this very hour, on this very network, in early 1998, of cells from the Middle East who sought to attack us, here? Who preempted them in order to strangle us with the trivia that was, �All Monica All The Time�? Who distracted whom? This is, of course, where�as is inevitable�Mr. Bush and his henchmen prove not quite as smart as they think they are. The full responsibility for 9/11 is obviously shared by three administrations, possibly four. But, Mr. Bush, if you are now trying to convince us by proxy that it�s all about the distractions of 1998 and 1999, then you will have to face a startling fact that your minions may have hidden from you. The distractions of 1998 and 1999, Mr. Bush, were carefully manufactured, and lovingly executed, not by Bill Clinton, but by the same people who got you elected President. Thus, instead of some commendable acknowledgment that you were even in office on 9/11 and the lost months before it, we have your sleazy and sloppy rewriting of history, designed by somebody who evidently read the Orwell playbook too quickly. Thus, instead of some explanation for the inertia of your first eight months in office, we are told that you have kept us "safe" ever since�a statement that might range anywhere from zero, to 100 percent, true. We have nothing but your word, and your word has long since ceased to mean anything. And, of course, the one time you have ever given us specifics about what you have kept us safe from, Mr. Bush, you got the name of the supposedly targeted Tower in Los Angeles wrong. Thus was it left for the previous president to say what so many of us have felt; what so many of us have given you a pass for in the months and even the years after the attack: You did not try. You ignored the evidence gathered by your predecessor. You ignored the evidence gathered by your own people. Then, you blamed your predecessor. That would be a textbook definition, Mr. Bush, of cowardice. To enforce the lies of the present, it is necessary to erase the truths of the past. That was one of the great mechanical realities Eric Blair�writing as George Orwell�gave us in the book �1984.� The great philosophical reality he gave us, Mr. Bush, may sound as familiar to you, as it has lately begun to sound familiar to me. "The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power... "Power is not a means; it is an end. "One does not establish a dictatorship to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. "The object of persecution, is persecution. The object of torture, is torture. The object of power� is power." Earlier last Friday afternoon, before the Fox ambush, speaking in the far different context of the closing session of his remarkable Global Initiative, Mr. Clinton quoted Abraham Lincoln�s State of the Union address from 1862. "We must disenthrall ourselves." Mr. Clinton did not quote the rest of Mr. Lincoln�s sentence. He might well have. "We must disenthrall ourselves and then we shall save our country." And so has Mr. Clinton helped us to disenthrall ourselves, and perhaps enabled us, even at this late and bleak date, to save our country. The "free pass" has been withdrawn, Mr. Bush. You did not act to prevent 9/11. We do not know what you have done to prevent another 9/11. You have failed us�then leveraged that failure, to justify a purposeless war in Iraq which will have, all too soon, claimed more American lives than did 9/11. You have failed us anew in Afghanistan. And you have now tried to hide your failures, by blaming your predecessor. And now you exploit your failure, to rationalize brazen torture which doesn�t work anyway; which only condemns our soldiers to water-boarding; which only humiliates our country further in the world; and which no true American would ever condone, let alone advocate. And there it is, Mr. Bush: Are yours the actions of a true American? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:47
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:47
11 lines
1591 bytes
1591 bytes
sgtbob wrote: > It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a > monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. "Bullied"??? Have you loked at Chris Wallace? Take your fucking Olberscum lying and got to HELL!!!!!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Anon
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:00
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:00
16 lines
1823 bytes
1823 bytes
Wallace is one of those faggy little snotty asswipes that always rat out their friends! "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:QQcSg.15295$Db2.14850@fe09.news.easynews.com... > sgtbob wrote: > >> It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a >> monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. > > > "Bullied"??? > > Have you loked at Chris Wallace? > > Take your fucking Olberscum lying and got to HELL!!!!!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01
19 lines
1949 bytes
1949 bytes
<HMFIC>@1369;} < wrote: > Wallace is one of those faggy little You're a piece of subhuman excrement! > "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message > news:QQcSg.15295$Db2.14850@fe09.news.easynews.com... >> sgtbob wrote: >> >>> It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a >>> monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. >> >> "Bullied"??? >> >> Have you loked at Chris Wallace? >> >> Take your fucking Olberscum lying and got to HELL!!!!! > >
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:06
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:06
34 lines
2376 bytes
2376 bytes
<HMFIC>@1369;} < wrote: > Wallace is one of those faggy 72.79.107.246 = [ pool-72-79-107-246.nwrknj.east.verizon.net ] OrgName: Verizon Internet Services Inc. OrgID: VRIS Address: 1880 Campus Commons Dr City: Reston StateProv: VA PostalCode: 20191 Country: US NetRange: 72.64.0.0 - 72.95.255.255 CIDR: 72.64.0.0/11 NetName: VIS-72-64 NetHandle: NET-72-64-0-0-1 Parent: NET-72-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.VERIZON.NET NameServer: NS4.VERIZON.NET Comment: RegDate: 2005-06-24 Updated: 2005-12-13 OrgAbuseHandle: VISAB-ARIN OrgAbuseName: VIS Abuse OrgAbusePhone: 1-214-513-6711 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@verizon.net OrgTechHandle: ZV20-ARIN OrgTechName: Verizon Internet Services OrgTechPhone: 1-703-295-4583 OrgTechEmail: IPMGMT@verizon.com
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Yaketyak
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:10
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:10
37 lines
1831 bytes
1831 bytes
Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of his saying.. "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" he just used different words to propagate another lie.. and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. LMAO at the fools. On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:25:36 -0500, sgtbob <sgtbob@atw.us> wrote: >A textbook definition of cowardice When a group of people have no DIRECT power, ...they will always seek INDIRECT power... this explains activist judges in our courts and Bill Clinton's refusal to undestand that he isnt president anymore,. thank God !
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:23
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:23
19 lines
1934 bytes
1934 bytes
Yaketyak wrote: > > Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of > his saying.. > > "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" > > he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > > and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the > cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. > > > LMAO at the fools. > It was the same show all over again, when Pinnochio's finger starts wagging, he's LYING!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Joseph Welch
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:08
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:08
26 lines
2075 bytes
2075 bytes
"Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > he just used different words to propagate another lie.. What "other lie"? Explain. -- George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider, their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government. Supporting Bush is treason. *************** JW *************** "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?" http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Siva
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:22
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:22
54 lines
3816 bytes
3816 bytes
Joseph Welch wrote: > "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message > news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > > > he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > > What "other lie"? > > Explain. > > > -- > George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider, > their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other > western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and > violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States > Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American > freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government. > Supporting Bush is treason. Both clinton and babybush sucked in fighting Islamic rebel groups because both failed to remove the root cause of the rebels' hatred toward the US--the merkin government's ongoing presence in the Middle East with the blessing of brutal monarchial dictators and merkin government's ongoing support of the Israeli government--which routinely murders schoolchildren and bulldozes Palestinians. Furthermore, re: the so-called "War on Terror", both failed to attack the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world (in terms of innocent lives claimed and dollars spent): the U. S. A. Leaving the Middle East alone has *always* worked to eliminate retaliatory Islamic terrorism in the countries that have tried it, or have never bugged the Middle East, i. e. how much terrorism is there in Spain since Spain quit Iraq, and how much Islamic terrorism is there in countries like Bolivia, Peru, Switzerland? On the other hand, bombing, invading, occupying, sponsoring monarchs, and/or otherwise interfering in the politics of the Middle East--which the US has done for the last 50 years and continues to do--has *never* worked. In fact, as history has proven, it's only made merika's security worse. But then one has to consider the creed of the US government--if it doesn't work, keep doing it, and don't try something new. > > *************** > JW > *************** > "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have > you left no sense of decency?" > http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:28
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:28
9 lines
1571 bytes
1571 bytes
Joseph Welch wrote: > "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message > news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > >> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > > What "other lie"? Shaddup wife pimper!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:58
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:58
54 lines
3442 bytes
3442 bytes
Siva wrote:
> Where does "router.yugma.com" come from?
One of your old posts I guess:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
path:
g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Siva" <prancer...@operamail.com>
Newsgroups:
az.politics,tx.politics,wash.politics,ca.politics,talk.politics.guns
Subject: babybush to Homeland Security: "You're doing a heck of a job,
Doylie!"
Date: 5 Apr 2006 16:56:41 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <1144281401.021054.295270@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.109.203.162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1144281406 9007 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2006
23:56:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:56:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.109.203.162;
posting-account=KCIELwwAAACHsAzNb5HOnwXKW9C8iHtp
Indeed, he's keeping a close eye on our kids. . .
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Indeed, he's keeping a close eye on our kids. . .
67.109.203.162 = [ router.yugma.com ]
network: Class-Name: network
network: ID: NET-XO-NET-436dcba0
network: Auth-Area: 67.104.0.0/13
network: Network-Name: XO-NET-436dcba0
network: Organization;I: Yugma (220987-1)
network: IP-Network: 67.109.203.160/27
network: Admin-Contact;I: XCIA-ARIN
network: Tech-Contact;I: XCIA-ARIN
network: Created: 20040322
network: Updated: 20040407
network: Updated-By: ipad...@eng.xo.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tightened up a bit of late have you?
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Yaketyak
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:49
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:49
30 lines
2022 bytes
2022 bytes
I would venture to say that the "red face" is from too much booze from the rosy cheeks he had.. not to mention that bulbous reddish beak he's developing.. makeup works wonders but only so much. On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:23:44 GMT, Colossus <forbin@project.hd> wrote: >Yaketyak wrote: >> >> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >> his saying.. >> >> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >> >> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >> >> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >> >> >> LMAO at the fools. >> > > >It was the same show all over again, when Pinnochio's finger starts >wagging, he's LYING!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Yaketyak
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:50
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:50
21 lines
1563 bytes
1563 bytes
take your pick, but this was obviously way over your understanding threshold.. democratic socialist education does that to you. On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:08:13 -0700, "Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@freewebspace.com> wrote: > >"Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > >> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > >What "other lie"? > >Explain.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:32
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:32
76 lines
3882 bytes
3882 bytes
Irwin Corey wrote: > "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote in message > news:ZoESg.906$La2.327@fed1read08... >> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>> >>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>> his saying.. >>> >>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>> >>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>> >>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>> >>> >>> LMAO at the fools. >> >> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >> sexual relations >> One entry found for sexual relations. >> Main Entry: sexual relations >> Function: noun plural >> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=sexual%20relations >> >> >> FROM: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary >> results for sexual relations >> Definition >> intercourse (SEX) >> noun [U] (ALSO sexual intercourse) FORMAL >> the act of having sex: >> vaginal/anal intercourse >> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=sexual+relations >> >> >> FROM: Dictionary.com >> results for: sexual relations >> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source >> sexual intercourse; coitus. >> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sexual+relations >> >> >> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >> >> > > > "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message > news:Xns984BB4D657978thefrogprince@70.169.32.36... >> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> said: >> >>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >> An entire new generation of grade-schoolers have been blessed by Clinton, > as >> blow jobs no longer count as sex. >> >> Who-Hoo...!!! >> >> -- >> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail >> >> "I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me >> about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane' >> >> > > Continued lies from a poster too cowardly to include or > even so much as address my entire remarks. Irwin, you were a hack as a comedian and you remain one as a partisan assassin, fuck off and DIE!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Irwin Corey
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:52
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:52
83 lines
4245 bytes
4245 bytes
"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:DCFSg.37540$Db2.4404@fe09.news.easynews.com... > Irwin Corey wrote: > > "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote in message > > news:ZoESg.906$La2.327@fed1read08... > >> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message > >> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > >>> > >>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of > >>> his saying.. > >>> > >>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" > >>> > >>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > >>> > >>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the > >>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. > >>> > >>> > >>> LMAO at the fools. > >> > >> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary > >> sexual relations > >> One entry found for sexual relations. > >> Main Entry: sexual relations > >> Function: noun plural > >> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE > >> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=sexual%20relations > >> > >> > >> FROM: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary > >> results for sexual relations > >> Definition > >> intercourse (SEX) > >> noun [U] (ALSO sexual intercourse) FORMAL > >> the act of having sex: > >> vaginal/anal intercourse > >> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=sexual+relations > >> > >> > >> FROM: Dictionary.com > >> results for: sexual relations > >> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source > >> sexual intercourse; coitus. > >> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sexual+relations > >> > >> > >> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. > >> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. > >> > >> > > > > > > "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message > > news:Xns984BB4D657978thefrogprince@70.169.32.36... > >> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> said: > >> > >>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. > >>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. > >> An entire new generation of grade-schoolers have been blessed by Clinton, > > as > >> blow jobs no longer count as sex. > >> > >> Who-Hoo...!!! > >> > >> -- > >> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail > >> > >> "I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me > >> about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane' > >> > >> > > > > Continued lies from a poster too cowardly to include or > > even so much as address my entire remarks. > > Irwin, you were a hack as a comedian and you remain one as a partisan > assassin, fuck off and DIE! Yet another stellar, issue oriented refutation. And while quite obviously not a comedian himself, he's undeniably a total an utter clown.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:20
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:20
32 lines
2472 bytes
2472 bytes
retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: > >> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>> >>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>> his saying.. >>> >>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>> >>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>> >>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>> >>> >>> LMAO at the fools. >> >> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >> sexual relations >> One entry found for sexual relations. >> Main Entry: sexual relations >> Function: noun plural >> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE > > > Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me scum!?!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:21
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:21
79 lines
4329 bytes
4329 bytes
Irwin Corey wrote: > "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message > news:DCFSg.37540$Db2.4404@fe09.news.easynews.com... >> Irwin Corey wrote: >>> "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote in message >>> news:ZoESg.906$La2.327@fed1read08... >>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>>> his saying.. >>>>> >>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>>> >>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>>> >>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LMAO at the fools. >>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>>> sexual relations >>>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>>> Function: noun plural >>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >>>> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=sexual%20relations >>>> >>>> >>>> FROM: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary >>>> results for sexual relations >>>> Definition >>>> intercourse (SEX) >>>> noun [U] (ALSO sexual intercourse) FORMAL >>>> the act of having sex: >>>> vaginal/anal intercourse >>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=sexual+relations >>>> >>>> >>>> FROM: Dictionary.com >>>> results for: sexual relations >>>> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source >>>> sexual intercourse; coitus. >>>> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sexual+relations >>>> >>>> >>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns984BB4D657978thefrogprince@70.169.32.36... >>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> said: >>>> >>>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >>>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >>>> An entire new generation of grade-schoolers have been blessed by > Clinton, >>> as >>>> blow jobs no longer count as sex. >>>> >>>> Who-Hoo...!!! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail >>>> >>>> "I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me >>>> about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane' >>>> >>>> >>> Continued lies from a poster too cowardly to include or >>> even so much as address my entire remarks. >> Irwin, you were a hack as a comedian and you remain one as a partisan >> assassin, fuck off and DIE! > > Yet another stellar, issue oriented refutation. > You aren't worth the dog spit to lick your oqn ass with, fuck off and DIE!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Irwin Corey
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:27
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:27
38 lines
2785 bytes
2785 bytes
"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... > retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: > > > >> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message > >> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > >>> > >>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of > >>> his saying.. > >>> > >>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" > >>> > >>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > >>> > >>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the > >>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. > >>> > >>> > >>> LMAO at the fools. > >> > >> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary > >> sexual relations > >> One entry found for sexual relations. > >> Main Entry: sexual relations > >> Function: noun plural > >> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE > > > > > > Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. > > > Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned > well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me scum!?! Try not standing in front of a mirror when composing a usenet newsgroup post, psycho. We can hardly see to read through our tears of hysterical laughter as it is.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Irwin Corey
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:30
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:30
86 lines
4746 bytes
4746 bytes
"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:UkGSg.83737$%Q2.81383@fe03.news.easynews.com... > Irwin Corey wrote: > > "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message > > news:DCFSg.37540$Db2.4404@fe09.news.easynews.com... > >> Irwin Corey wrote: > >>> "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote in message > >>> news:ZoESg.906$La2.327@fed1read08... > >>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message > >>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... > >>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of > >>>>> his saying.. > >>>>> > >>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" > >>>>> > >>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. > >>>>> > >>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the > >>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> LMAO at the fools. > >>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary > >>>> sexual relations > >>>> One entry found for sexual relations. > >>>> Main Entry: sexual relations > >>>> Function: noun plural > >>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE > >>>> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=sexual%20relations > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> FROM: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary > >>>> results for sexual relations > >>>> Definition > >>>> intercourse (SEX) > >>>> noun [U] (ALSO sexual intercourse) FORMAL > >>>> the act of having sex: > >>>> vaginal/anal intercourse > >>>> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=sexual+relations > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> FROM: Dictionary.com > >>>> results for: sexual relations > >>>> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source > >>>> sexual intercourse; coitus. > >>>> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sexual+relations > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. > >>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message > >>> news:Xns984BB4D657978thefrogprince@70.169.32.36... > >>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> said: > >>>> > >>>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. > >>>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. > >>>> An entire new generation of grade-schoolers have been blessed by > > Clinton, > >>> as > >>>> blow jobs no longer count as sex. > >>>> > >>>> Who-Hoo...!!! > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail > >>>> > >>>> "I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me > >>>> about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane' > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Continued lies from a poster too cowardly to include or > >>> even so much as address my entire remarks. > >> Irwin, you were a hack as a comedian and you remain one as a partisan > >> assassin, fuck off and DIE! > > > > Yet another stellar, issue oriented refutation. > > > You aren't worth the dog spit to lick your oqn ass with, fuck off and DIE! Try not standing in front of a mirror when composing a usenet newsgroup post, psycho. We can hardly see to read through our tears of hysterical laughter as it is.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:42
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:42
35 lines
2780 bytes
2780 bytes
Irwin Corey wrote: > "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message > news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... >> retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>>> his saying.. >>>>> >>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>>> >>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>>> >>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LMAO at the fools. >>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>>> sexual relations >>>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>>> Function: noun plural >>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >>> >>> Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. >> >> Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned >> well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me scum!?! > > Try not standing in front of a mirror Try eating yours!
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:42
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:42
86 lines
4786 bytes
4786 bytes
Irwin Corey wrote: > "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message > news:UkGSg.83737$%Q2.81383@fe03.news.easynews.com... >> Irwin Corey wrote: >>> "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message >>> news:DCFSg.37540$Db2.4404@fe09.news.easynews.com... >>>> Irwin Corey wrote: >>>>> "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote in message >>>>> news:ZoESg.906$La2.327@fed1read08... >>>>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>>>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>>>>> his saying.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LMAO at the fools. >>>>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>>>>> sexual relations >>>>>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>>>>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>>>>> Function: noun plural >>>>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >>>>>> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=sexual%20relations >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> FROM: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary >>>>>> results for sexual relations >>>>>> Definition >>>>>> intercourse (SEX) >>>>>> noun [U] (ALSO sexual intercourse) FORMAL >>>>>> the act of having sex: >>>>>> vaginal/anal intercourse >>>>>> > http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=sexual+relations >>>>>> >>>>>> FROM: Dictionary.com >>>>>> results for: sexual relations >>>>>> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source >>>>>> sexual intercourse; coitus. >>>>>> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sexual+relations >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >>>>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns984BB4D657978thefrogprince@70.169.32.36... >>>>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> NO ONE has claimed that he had intercourse with her. >>>>>>> The liars of course, as always, are those of your ilk. >>>>>> An entire new generation of grade-schoolers have been blessed by >>> Clinton, >>>>> as >>>>>> blow jobs no longer count as sex. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who-Hoo...!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail >>>>>> >>>>>> "I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me >>>>>> about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane' >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Continued lies from a poster too cowardly to include or >>>>> even so much as address my entire remarks. >>>> Irwin, you were a hack as a comedian and you remain one as a partisan >>>> assassin, fuck off and DIE! >>> Yet another stellar, issue oriented refutation. >>> >> You aren't worth the dog spit to lick your oqn ass with, fuck off and DIE! > > Try not Brilliant, event he real Corey could have come up with something snappy. I dub you - Pat Paulsen.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Colossus
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:43
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:43
41 lines
3144 bytes
3144 bytes
retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:27:36 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: > >> "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message >> news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... >>> retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >>>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>>>> his saying.. >>>>>> >>>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>>>> >>>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>>>> >>>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> LMAO at the fools. >>>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>>>> sexual relations >>>>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>>>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>>>> Function: noun plural >>>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >>>> >>>> Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. >>> >>> Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned >>> well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me scum!?! >> Try not standing in front of a mirror when composing >> a usenet newsgroup post, psycho. We can hardly see >> to read through our tears of hysterical laughter as it is. > > > He truly is colossal. Isn't he? Interested in measuring up mano a mano?
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Bill Walker
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11
21 lines
2072 bytes
2072 bytes
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message news:hk9mh2hes36qvbad06aft0658b418lqguj@4ax.com... > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: > > > Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. People are > dying and our rights are evaporating. They're only too happy to have > you argue legal niceties and definitions and move the spotlight off of > todays appalling situation. You nailed it again, Retro.. These Bushwhores exist to disrupt, distract and blow smoke.. LOL. Regards Bill Walker Irving, Tx. > > ________________ > I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me. > Terence
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Bill Walker
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:13
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:13
40 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... > retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >> >>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>> >>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>> his saying.. >>>> >>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>> >>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>> >>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>> >>>> >>>> LMAO at the fools. >>> >>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>> sexual relations >>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>> Function: noun plural >>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >> >> >> Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. > > > Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned well > tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me scum!?! LMAO.. pitiful.. Bill Walker Irving, Tx.
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Bill Walker
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:18
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:18
41 lines
2934 bytes
2934 bytes
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message news:tvcmh25l0bsfnvhrgbk56suk8nt2sl7onj@4ax.com... > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:27:36 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: > >>"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message >>news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... >>> retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >>> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >>> > >>> >> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>> >> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. >>> >>> >>> Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned >>> well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me >>> scum!?! >> >>Try not standing in front of a mirror when composing >>a usenet newsgroup post, psycho. We can hardly see >>to read through our tears of hysterical laughter as it is. > > > He truly is colossal. Isn't he? > > He must be on disability as much as he posts and all the pent up > random rage. <chuckle> Close.. But, gotta hand it to him.. He manages to keep serious discussion to a minimum with all the infantile acrobatics.. Regards, Retro. Bill Walker Irving, Tx. > > ________________ > I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me. > Terence
Re: Keith Olbermann comments on Bill Clinton's Fox News interview
Author: Bill Walker
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:19
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:19
50 lines
3376 bytes
3376 bytes
"Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message news:ExHSg.39115$Db2.30227@fe09.news.easynews.com... > retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:27:36 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >> >>> "Colossus" <forbin@project.hd> wrote in message >>> news:ujGSg.83721$%Q2.17637@fe03.news.easynews.com... >>>> retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:28 -0500, "Irwin Corey" <ic@home.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Yaketyak" <yaketyak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message >>>>>> news:839jh2ta9h2k148q36s4umolm7p4lvi0j0@4ax.com... >>>>>>> Bill Clinton's statement, accusation or LIE was just another way of >>>>>>> his saying.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I never had sexual relations with that woman, miss Lewinski" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> he just used different words to propagate another lie.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and the demobot socialist lemmings ooze from the cracks in the >>>>>>> cesspool to back his lie up to the hilt.. nothing new here.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LMAO at the fools. >>>>>> FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary >>>>>> sexual relations >>>>>> One entry found for sexual relations. >>>>>> Main Entry: sexual relations >>>>>> Function: noun plural >>>>>> : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE >>>>> >>>>> Don't argue trivia from 10 years ago with these morons. >>>> >>>> Shut yer festering cake-hole you worthless shit scraping, I'll damned >>>> well tell you when to speak, and not a moment before, you hear me >>>> scum!?! >>> Try not standing in front of a mirror when composing >>> a usenet newsgroup post, psycho. We can hardly see >>> to read through our tears of hysterical laughter as it is. >> >> >> He truly is colossal. Isn't he? > > Interested in measuring up mano a mano? Holy Shit... ROTFLMAO Bill Walker Irving, Tx.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads