🚀 go-pugleaf

Big Steel <Steel@Steel.com> wrote in
news:7bednUu-8NeRiO7SnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@earthlink.com: 

> On 3/28/2012 8:00 AM, DanS wrote:
>> Big Steel<Steel1@Steel1.com>  wrote in
>> news:PJydnZ8w8ud33e_SnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>>
>>> On 3/27/2012 1:06 PM, DanS wrote:
>>>> Big Steel<Steel1@Steel1.com>   wrote in
>>>> news:UMudnfRPLMNwfezSnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/27/2012 10:36 AM, DanS wrote:
>>>>>> Don't you think the kid going back to Zimmerman,
>>>>>> confronting him, and attacking him, was a bad decision
>>>>>> on it's own? I mean, if he was being "chased" and "got
>>>>>> away", why go and confront the guy doing the chasing?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Just a little fact to correct your mus-information.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/0
>>>>> 3/ 20 /MNE41NNO23.DTL>
>>>>>
>>>>> <copied>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Oh he's right behind me, he's right behind me again,"
>>>>> 17-year-old Trayvon Martin told his girlfriend on his
>>>>> cell phone, the Martin family's attorney said.
>>>>>
>>>>> The girl later heard Martin say, "Why are you following
>>>>> me?" Another man asked, "What are you doing around
>>>>> here?" attorney Benjamin Crump said.
>>>>>
>>>>> <end>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it should have been "I am the neighborhood watch
>>>>> captain and what are you doing here?"
>>>>
>>>> Facts?
>>>>
>>>> The only fact here is that *no one* witnessed the
>>>> initial battle. No one knows if the kid attacked
>>>> Zimmerman first, or visa-versa, or anything like that,
>>>> but, the physical evidence points to Zimmermans story as
>>>> being accurate. 
>>>>
>>>> Yeah...more facts, since, the kid's Twitter and Facebook
>>>> accounts have been closed and deleted.
>>>>
>>>> Why? My guess, they didn't show Martin in the sweet
>>>> little innocent way the MSM wanted it to. (MSM = Main
>>>> Stream Media)
>>>>
>>>> Why is the MSM *only* showing the picture of the kid
>>>> from years ago, as well as *only* showing the mug shot
>>>> picture of Zimmerman from 2005 when he was arrested?
>>>>
>>>> Why? Because, that's what the MSM wants, and you, and
>>>> thousands of others have eaten it all up.
>>>>
>>>> Here, have yo ueven seen these?....
>>>> http://thepartyofknow.com/2012/03/26/media-using-biased-p
>>>> ic s- of-trayvon-martin-and-george-zimmerman/
>>>>
>>>> Why? Because the MSM *knows* that both older pictures
>>>> are going to get far more of a emotional response than
>>>> current pictures.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying Zimmerman should go free, or is innocent
>>>> of anything, only that you were duped by the MSM and
>>>> started acting exactly like they wanted you to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I knew exactly wat the situation was about
>>
>> No...you don't. You only know what the media has wanted
>> you to believe.
> 
> You are a clown.

You're the clown here.

>> It's plainly apparent. In another post you are now saying
>> Zimmerman *wasn't* a racist, based on what his black
>> friends say.
> 
> The man is guilty.
>>
>> What else will you be wrong about?
> 
> Who the hell are you -- you clown? You pull your head out
> of your ass and then you choke on it.

<Irrelevant 40'ish year old story deleted.> 
 
> Point blank you kiss my ass as you come with your bullshit.

>>
>> Why is the media only showing the old picture of *both* of
>> them? The mugshot of Zimmerman from 2005, and the only
>> picture of Martin?
>>
>> http://www.blackmediascoop.com/2012/03/26/this-is-what-
>> trayvons-killer-looks-like-today/
>>
>> .....becuase the MSM wanted you reaction, and got it. They
>> didn't want yo to see the smiling suit wearing balding
>> Zimmerman.....they wanted you to see the orange jum
> 
>> stern-faced Zimmerman to elicit your reaction.
>>
> Look, I reacted to the black radio deejays and other black
> personality that brought this case to my attention.
> 
>>> and came to my
>>> own conlusion on the case.
>>
>> So, you share the same mentality with Zimmerman?
> 
>> Nice.
>>
> 
> Oh so now you are going to slighter like a snake in the
> grass and project what I am thinking.

No you self-righteous dill-hole....

.....you claimed Zimmerman had no right to be judge, jury, and 
executioner based on little he had information and you go 
right out and state you *know* what happened, and Zimmerman's 
totallly guilty of murdering this kid because he's black, and 
that he's going to fry one way or another.

You claimed to have come to a conclusion already in this case, 
assumingly based on all questionable evidence.

I'm not "projecting" anything. I'm reminding *you* of 
something *you* said.