🚀 go-pugleaf

On 3/27/2012 1:06 PM, DanS wrote:
> Big Steel<Steel1@Steel1.com>  wrote in
> news:UMudnfRPLMNwfezSnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>
>> On 3/27/2012 10:36 AM, DanS wrote:
>>> Don't you think the kid going back to Zimmerman,
>>> confronting him, and attacking him, was a bad decision on
>>> it's own? I mean, if he was being "chased" and "got away",
>>> why go and confront the guy doing the chasing?
>>>
>> Just a little fact to correct your mus-information.
>>
>>
>> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/20
>> /MNE41NNO23.DTL>
>>
>> <copied>
>>
>> "Oh he's right behind me, he's right behind me again,"
>> 17-year-old Trayvon Martin told his girlfriend on his cell
>> phone, the Martin family's attorney said.
>>
>> The girl later heard Martin say, "Why are you following
>> me?" Another man asked, "What are you doing around here?"
>> attorney Benjamin Crump said.
>>
>> <end>
>>
>> Maybe it should have been "I am the neighborhood watch
>> captain and what are you doing here?"
>
> Facts?
>
> The only fact here is that *no one* witnessed the initial
> battle. No one knows if the kid attacked Zimmerman first, or
> visa-versa, or anything like that, but, the physical evidence
> points to Zimmermans story as being accurate.
>
> Yeah...more facts, since, the kid's Twitter and Facebook
> accounts have been closed and deleted.
>
> Why? My guess, they didn't show Martin in the sweet little
> innocent way the MSM wanted it to. (MSM = Main Stream Media)
>
> Why is the MSM *only* showing the picture of the kid from
> years ago, as well as *only* showing the mug shot picture of
> Zimmerman from 2005 when he was arrested?
>
> Why? Because, that's what the MSM wants, and you, and
> thousands of others have eaten it all up.
>
> Here, have yo ueven seen these?....
> http://thepartyofknow.com/2012/03/26/media-using-biased-pics-
> of-trayvon-martin-and-george-zimmerman/
>
> Why? Because the MSM *knows* that both older pictures are
> going to get far more of a emotional response than current
> pictures.
>
> I'm not saying Zimmerman should go free, or is innocent of
> anything, only that you were duped by the MSM and started
> acting exactly like they wanted you to.
>

I knew exactly wat the situation was about and came to my own conlusion 
on the case. It didn't add up to and it's not adding

I was not duped by anything.

You explain this.

<http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/state/report--lead-investigator-wanted-to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen>

<copied>

Serino filed an affidavit on Feb. 26, the night Martin was shot and 
killed by Zimmerman, saying he did not believe Zimmerman's version of 
events.

<end>

Explain why Zimmerman's attorney when he knew he was going to get  drilled.

<http://thelastword.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/27/10878312-zimmermans-lawyer-bails-on-interview>