Article View: alt.wired
Article #175Re: WiReD Magazine - Banned in Canada
From: Steak? with Nutrasuc
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 22:18
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 22:18
76 lines
5970 bytes
5970 bytes
Jim Mercer (jim@reptiles.org) wrote: : i doubt that the net will legally become a nation unto itself, so users of : the net should have consideration for other users. The lack of physical attributes and something seizable with military force would probably scare the rest of the nations in the world too much for this to happen. It would probably delight terrorists tho. : this would apply in many areas, most of which are "religious". : christians should respect muslims, american "democracy" should respect : canadian "democracy". MS-DOS users should respect Mac users. This is a wild sci-fi story, Jim! The above may be possible, but the right to free speech remains. Whether people can use it without flaming or being weenies is to be seen. No, wait, I can see it now, and the usenet is quite full of weenies. (I'm one, aren't you? :) : if it were possible to police them, i would probably support that initiative. This is probably where we differ. I agree with the common carrier pov you have, strongly, and I'll push for it. (Where's the protest location at? :) However, policing? I dont think so. There's going to be so much garbage on the usenet it will be hard to sort through it. I think that varying degrees of the net will emerge, ranging from free-for-all to semi private newsgroups thru private groups (which are embodied right now by mailing lists, which STILL, to me, represent the most pure form of INFORMATION (as opposed to random data, flames and poorly written posts)). People will pay corporations (Clarinet case in point) to edit their newsfeeds for content (and obey the law I spose). I have faith in the human species to overcome its fear of information reaching everyone and everyone becoming equal. I have faith that people can become mature enough to deal with what they read, and respond accordingly. I dont think that any amount of policing will be healthy. Who will fund it to begin with? This cant happen effectively if we still have a geographical concept of "nation". Wait 50 years. There's already a large amount of non-authoritarian self-policing going on here - alot of people learn the hardships of the Usenet very quickly - such as how easy it is to get flamed, when not to use ":)" (I'm in an 12step prog. currently for that, so dont talk to me about it... :) :) :), etc etc. People DO learn how to behave themselves, even when there's very little to lose for NOT behaving. This is all routed in theories of sociology which I dont know much about. I am sure there are tons of emerging studies of the net which see it as a very unique and unprecedented social structure, which has evolved its own culture and sets of unwritten, yet abided by, rules. I have faith that everyone will come to know and obey these laws to some extent. : it isn't possible, so the best i can do is ask them to have some common : courtesy, and respect the beliefs of others, even if those beliefs : radically differ from their own. What if the NSA managed to get encryption outlawed in the US somehow (a radical point, but bear with me) - then you posted a uuencoded PGP somewhere? As it is, alot of FTP sites are at risk (last I heard) for having PGP online, and PGP fingering sites were shut down (and moved? to europe?), etc. Do you agree with that? Will you abide by that rule? Assuming there's no penalty for it since you are outside their jurisdiction (tho the US has a nifty history of some classiq extraditions). : in the above, i am not trying to quiet debate, i would encourage it. but : that debate should take place in an appropriate group, not a roving street : battle as we currently have. Its always a roving street battle to someone. :) I think we've manage to avoid most flameage here, and I've reset my pov of the usenet back a year or two. Its not quite as bad as I thought, since I've been able to reply to intelligent posts in here (while avoiding others) - its not been a total loss by any stretch tho. I quite enjoy this. /kc -- Ken P. Chasse -- Sysadmin, Sonic Interzone "Carrying netnews does not a Public Access email/Usenet -- 416-968-7292 publisher make." - something spooge@sizone.pci.on.ca -- Toronto CANADA I'd like to see. Support it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1994Apr7.221855.2243@sizone.pci.on.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!kink!sizone!rootReferences:
<2msfqr$pcv@ghost.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> <2n63gt$5i3@panix.com> <CnDtq2.JBu@reptiles.org> <1994Apr3.104200.14042@sizone.pci.on.ca> <CnrKG5.ELt@reptiles.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11544f,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid11544f,public X-Google-Thread: f504b,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: 1064b2,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1064b2,public X-Google-Thread: 1046d3,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1046d3,public X-Google-Thread: 1009fe,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1009fe,public X-Google-Thread: 1159e4,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1159e4,public X-Google-Thread: 1046d5,70c8cc2ee9297cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1046d5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-07 15:18:55 PST Newsgroups: alt.wired,can.legal,can.general,alt.pub-ban.homolka,alt.fan.karla-homolka,alt.censorship,soc.culture.canada,comp.org.eff.talk,ont.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!kink!sizone!root From: root@sizone.pci.on.ca (Steak? with Nutrasuc) Subject: Re: WiReD Magazine - Banned in Canada Followup-To: alt.wired,can.legal,can.general,alt.pub-ban.homolka,alt.fan.karla-homolka,alt.censorship,soc.culture.canada,comp.org.eff.talk,ont.general References: <2msfqr$pcv@ghost.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> <2n63gt$5i3@panix.com> <CnDtq2.JBu@reptiles.org> <1994Apr3.104200.14042@sizone.pci.on.ca> <CnrKG5.ELt@reptiles.org> Organization: Sonic Interzone $FREE$ public access email/news 416-968-7292 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 1994 22:18:55 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Message-ID: <1994Apr7.221855.2243@sizone.pci.on.ca> Distribution: inet Lines: 76