🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4ijurv$o9q@dhp.com>, Aga <aga@dhp.com> wrote:
>[ a repost of an article David Lawrence tried to censor]
>
>CRC1111 (crc1111@aol.com) wrote:
>> :> Stanley Brown (VWQE99B@prodigy.com) wrote:
>> :>
>> :> The local office just got some E-mail here saying that David Lawrence, 
>> : > the guy who runs the Usenet newsgroup system for UUnet, was just
>> : > busted 
>> : >last night in Boston, for the rape of a 14 year old girl.  Does anyone 
>> : >have anything on this from the Boston Newspapers yet?  I was told they 
>> : >were going to try and cover up this story, because of MIT and all, so I
>> : >wondered if it had gotten out yet.
>
>> >In checking on this story, I had a Boston newspaper reporter send me an 
>> >e-mail reply, and he said that MIT was able to cover-up this story, and 
>> >that UUnet played a big part in the cover-up.  Just passing on relevant 
>> >information to the public, here.
>
>>      Isn't David Lawrence the guy that tries to silence his critics by
>> closing down their newsgroups?  
>
>
>Yes, he is well-known for doing that. The classic example is last April 
>when he tried to remove the "news.admin.policy" newsgroup from the usenet.
>
>The news.admin.policy is the anti-cabal newsgroup, and this Lawrence guy 
>is the "cabal" administrator ever since Spaff left.
>


	Yes--David Lawrence again tried to cancel news.admin.policy
this past Thursday and failed--all the large commercial providers
told him to stuff it as did any respectable smaller provider.  He
and UUnet shoul be ashamed of themselves--censorship is a terrible
thing but as we all know David cannot tolerate critism.



>>Is UUnet a major corporation and if so why are
>> they associated with this man? 
>
>because he worked for them before they went public.


	Ah--but that will now change.  Take a look at their
web page for example--they cannot afford to be publically
associated with censors like Mr. Lawrence for much longer.
He in fact issued the rmgroup from UUnet therefor
acting by default on their behalf.  Who are their major
customers--they need to be contacted.

				Steve

>
>> He is well known for his dishonesty and
>> censorship.  And why would MIT be associated with him and cover up
>> for him?  Surely they value their reputation.
>
>Maybe it is about time that the usenet people sue David Lawrence and MIT 
>and UUnet in one "class-action" like the smokers did.
>
>Mr. Steve Boursy is in the same Court district, so the standing
>would be easy to get.
>
>BTW, they paid off the mentally-retarded girl's foster parents to keep
>this story covered-up.  A Boston Lawyer told my neighbor about it on the 
>phone last night.  Dave Lawrence raped this mentally retarded 14-year 
>old, and she does not talk, so she is unable to be a witness, so he gets 
>away with rape.
>
>true story now.
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>DrG