🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4elce9$n25@cloner3.netcom.com>,
M.Grubor  <zando@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>In <4eio6p$emc@news.magi.com> nsidor@magi.com (Nicholas Sidor) writes: 
>>link@tss.no (Terje Bless) wrote:
>>>In article <DLwB3G.D5n.0.sheppard@torfree.net>, ab330@torfree.net
>>>(Bob Allisat) wrote:
>>
>>>[SNIP]
>>
>When they snip your stuff, you know they are afraid of you.
>Good Job, Bob!
>

	Yes.  They tend to be afraid to debate Bob.


>>>Word of warning to those of you who do not recognize the name Bob
>>>Allisat-
>>>Take a look at the URL:
>>><http://www.interlog.com/eye/Misc/Kooks/Allisat/allisat.htm>
>
>
>The web-page is all ad-hominum attacks which are unfounded.
>This is what happens when someone makes a significant mark on UseNet.
>Usually a group of censors assemble a bunch of lies about the guy,
>and then post them to a web page to try and defame a person.
>
>>Hey, never mind "word of warning"!! The Bob stuff on that site is
>hilarious.
>


	What I find amusing is that they debate him yet spend enormous
amounts of time following up on his posts calling him all sorts of
names trying to get others not to read him.  That means the content
of his posts is very threatening to the cabal.

	And Bob is most certainly correct--the EFF is dead--but that
happened morally long ago--now its just more concrete.

				Steve


>What is hilarious is how you are so afraid of the man that the 
>forum you pick to defame him is a web-page which is bound to be
>ad hominum attacks.  This is called dirty-back-stabbing behavior
>by a coward of UseNet.  It will be noted for the book.
>
>>Highly recommended. 
>>
>Yes, highly recommended reading for cowards.
>
>>nick
>>Nick Sidor
>>nsidor@magi.com
>>
>nick must be a small man, in both memnatal stature and self-worth
>image, since he seeks to defame without allowing any opportunity
>of any defense.  he will go into the "cowards-of-usenet" classification
>in the new "UseNet Anarchy" book by Grubor and Boursy.
>
>Bob Allisat is to be noted as one of the saviors of free-speech.
>His presence will provide the basis for the successfull legal argument
>against the Exon bill, if it ever passes.
>
>DrG
>
>
>