Thread View: alt.wired
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Alex Nishri
Wed, 04 May 1994 04:58
Re: Hey, I know -- let's threaten the president in e-mail
Author: Alex Nishri
Date: Wed, 04 May 1994 04:58
Date: Wed, 04 May 1994 04:58
45 lines
3872 bytes
3872 bytes
sean@sdg.dra.com Fri Apr 15 02:06:32 EDT 1994 says: >In article <Co7Du3.Dx0@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>, nishri@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca (Alex Nishri) writes: >> Americans are forbidden from phoning Cuba directly themselves. I think we >> can all agree that this limits free speech between those in the USA and >> those in Cuba. Of course, most Canadians respect the right of the USA to >> enact its own laws. But say, hypothetically, that a Canadian company >> offered the following service: Americans could phone a number in Canada, >> get a second dial tone, and then dial direct to Cuba. (Without going into >> details, this is not fiction.) > >Too bad you got your facts wrong. Its an economic embargo. Lots of people >telephone Cuba from the U.S. everyday (especially from south Florida). >However, AT&T (and soon Sprint, yes Sprint got approval to provide telephone >service to Cuba) is forbidden from sending money to Cuba. So the money >is deposited in an escrow account. > >Of course, the Cuban government doesn't like not getting the money. So >Cuba encourages people to route the calls through other countries (such >as Canada) which will pay Cuba. The U.S. Government had no problem with >a Canadian company offering a service where people in the U.S. could dial >a number in Canada and then direct dial to Cuba. They had a problem with >the transfer of money to Cuba. The Canadian company was blocked from >collecting money from people in the U.S. and sending part of it to Cuba, >not from making telephone calls to Cuba. extracted from a recent newspaper article (written by Larry Luxner): At least three Canadian telecom firms are reaping profits because of the lack of direct phone service between the United States and Cuba, a consequence of the embargo. Toronto Communications of Toronto, Ontario-based Globafon, and Hola Cuba all offer cheaper and better connections to Cuba than AT&T, the only US carrier now authorized to do business with the Communist island because it has agreed to give Cuba no revenues. All three offer pre-paid debit cards that allow callers in the United States to dial Cuba without operator assistance. The U.S. Treasury claims this violates the American embargo, since the Castro government gets at least part of the profits. For those losing the thread, Wired magazine is providing Canadians Internet access to information in violation of a temporary Canadian court order. They are doing this using computers located in the U.S.A. My example was of a parallel situation where a Canadian company operating on Canadian soil is offering a circumvention of American law. In this case, American law restricts the freedom of Americans to phone Cuba by restricting which carriers can be used and how those carriers may conduct business.
Jurisdiction
Author: sean
Date: Thu, 05 May 1994 05:03
Date: Thu, 05 May 1994 05:03
34 lines
2921 bytes
2921 bytes
In article <Cp9Htt.Ky@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>, nishri@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca (Alex Nishri) writes: > For those losing the thread, Wired magazine is providing Canadians Internet > access to information in violation of a temporary Canadian court order. > They are doing this using computers located in the U.S.A. My example was > of a parallel situation where a Canadian company operating on Canadian soil > is offering a circumvention of American law. In this case, American law > restricts the freedom of Americans to phone Cuba by restricting which > carriers can be used and how those carriers may conduct business. At least you are getting better at getting some of your facts straight. I disagree with you conclusions though. I agree that US law restricts the freedom of Americans to conduct business with Cuba. That is the definition of an economic embargo. But is a Canadian company circumventing American law while operating on Canadian soil? I say not. It is not illegal to provide telephone service from the US to Cuba (although I belive the ITU has rules about third-country routing of telephone calls). It is illegal to sell pre-paid calling cards in the U.S. and send part of the money to Cuba without a license from the U.S. Treasury. For your parallel situation, it is not illegal for WiReD to publish their magazine in the U.S., but it may have violated the court order to sell that issue of WiReD magazine in Canada. In neither case is the company "circumventing" the other country's law when operating outside the jurisdiction of the other country. They only get in trouble when they do something within the jurisdiction of that country. For example, selling in the U.S. pre-paid calling cards and sending part of the money to Cuba, or selling issues of a magazine in Canada that contains material that may be covered by a publication ban. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Domain: sean@dra.com, Voice: (Work) +1 314-432-1100
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads