Article View: altnet.general
Article #126Re: Should Altopia just claim bankruptcy?
From: DevilsPGD
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:12
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:12
27 lines
2567 bytes
2567 bytes
In message <1n6krq.1dt.19.1@news.alt.net> Chris Caputo <ccaputo@alt.net> wrote: >In general, with TCP performance testing, I find that a single unthrottled >stream is best able to utilize available bandwidth. Others may disagree >or have more scientific input. For performance testing under ideal circumstances, you're absolutely correct. When you're dealing with protocols that cannot be pipelined, add one additional connection so that between the time one command finishes and the next can be started, the alternate connection is still downloading. However, consider that you need the remote side to ACK packets before the sender can send more data -- As a result, your window size and latency will provide an upper maximum for the speed of a single TCP connection, regardless of available bandwidth -- In this situation, you either use something other then TCP, or open multiple TCP sessions. To see the effects of latency, http://www.fancygaphtrn.com/component/option,com_bandwidthcalc/Itemid,5/ has an interesting little calculator. Enter your data volume and time period, it will tell you the speed required. Next, enter your latency and TCP window size and it will calculate the number of TCP sessions required to fill your bandwidth.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<flcht317o7k23neii5d6143vgicdcqerjk@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!zen.net.uk!demorgan.zen.co.uk!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-sjc-05!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1mqbsi.ap2.17.1@news.alt.net> <1gi9t35je5toe9av4p85r7vu28qrma00mb@nntp4.usenetserver.com> <1n19p7.9e8.19.1@news.alt.net> <q09ct3hq5p2in6gs895elisou6eofsqr4f@nntp4.usenetserver.com> <1n4f1m.lfg.19.1@news.alt.net> <IiYBj.3385$Ny6.3338@newsfet29.ams> <1n6krq.1dt.19.1@news.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd665,d4024adfc75b3a93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd665,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!zen.net.uk!demorgan.zen.co.uk!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-sjc-05!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> Newsgroups: altnet.general,alt.binaries.news-server-comparison Subject: Re: Should Altopia just claim bankruptcy? Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:56 -0600 Organization: Disorganized Message-ID: <flcht317o7k23neii5d6143vgicdcqerjk@4ax.com> References: <1mqbsi.ap2.17.1@news.alt.net> <1gi9t35je5toe9av4p85r7vu28qrma00mb@nntp4.usenetserver.com> <1n19p7.9e8.19.1@news.alt.net> <q09ct3hq5p2in6gs895elisou6eofsqr4f@nntp4.usenetserver.com> <1n4f1m.lfg.19.1@news.alt.net> <IiYBj.3385$Ny6.3338@newsfet29.ams> <1n6krq.1dt.19.1@news.alt.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@supernews.com Lines: 27