🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:36:29 +0100,  wrote:

> "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>, took a moment to utter:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:25:32 +0100, (akula) <akula@sharks.plc.ltd> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 14:21:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:13:05 +0100, (akula) <akula@sharks.plc.ltd> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:05:32 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right, Chris - it *is* funny!  Especially when one considers
>>>>> that binary retention at your NSP is measured in hours, not days.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you actually test this?  I'm reading binaries from a month ago.
>>>
>>> Not using Altopia, kOOk.  Unless, of course you're referring to TEXT,
>>> which is a whole whopping 34 days or some such miniscule retention!
>>> LMAO!
>>
>> Binaries are 56 days, except multipart which is 5 days.
>>
>> Text is 56 days and increasing to an estimated 2 years.
>>
> Just to divert to something on topic for a mo'..are those estimates going to
> hold for text in binary Groups, ya think?
> Most all I have run across dump the text with the binary posts, same timeline.

I would think so: I've noticed articles expiring at different times in the same group.

P.S. followupping to a group I don't subscribe to means you won't get answers.

-- 
http://www.petersparrots.com    http://www.insanevideoclips.com    http://www.petersphotos.com

Federal Expresso:  When you absolutely, positively have to stay up all night.