🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:31:53 +0100, Alley00p <alley00p@mesazoic.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:21:53 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 06:45:56 +0100, (akula) <akula@sharks.plc.ltd> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:18:53 +0000 (UTC), Chris Caputo
>>> <ccaputo@alt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com> writes:
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:36:29 +0100,  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think so: I've noticed articles expiring at different times in
>>>>> the same group.
>>>>
>>>> Correct.  Our expiration times are not based on group name, but rather are
>>>> based on article type (text/binary/size/# of parts).  For example, a text
>>>> message posted to alt.binaries.x will last as long as a text message
>>>> posted to alt.test.
>>>
>>> Did you ever stop to think just how stupid that is?  IF your servers
>>> ever attain two years text retention, that means that if one were to
>>> download headers from, say, alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day two years
>>> from now, they would see a million REQ: dating back up to two
>>> years...just as an example.  Who the frig wants to waddle through all
>>> those expired text posts?
>>>
>>> I guess people have come to expect such moronic reasoning from you,
>>> Chris.  That's just one of many reasons why your NSP is third-rate.
>>
>> There are groups containing both chat and images.  Why remove the chat before necessary?
>
> To make you ask yet another stupid question.

Which you don't have the answer to.

-- 
http://www.petersparrots.com    http://www.insanevideoclips.com    http://www.petersphotos.com

Gary Glitter has said if he gets executed he wants cremating and his ashes putting in an etch-a-sketch, so the kids can still play with him!