🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:57:14 -0800 �
<h0plibbb_oili@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> from altnet.general wrote:
>Kate wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:01:30 -0800 �
>> <h0plibbb_oili@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> from altnet.general wrote:
>> >Kate wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 06:56:59 -0800 �
>> >> <h0plibbb_oili@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> from altnet.general wrote:
>> >> >Dave Korn wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>   heh, yeh, I agree with that definition of why hashbuster is actually all
>> >> >> the same.  in fact I'm willing to declare any post that is statistically
>> >> >> identical to noise as being noise.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Unless I missed it, CC hasn't said cascades were spam.  Others have
>> >> >> >said cascades were spam.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   he is apparently concerned that his users should cross-poast
>> >> >> "responsibly".
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   and i am informed that he has a problem with some kind of apparently
>> >> >> unholy devil-spawned accursed creation known as 'snuh'
>> >>
>> >> >That's news to me.
>> >>
>> >> >Have you been listening to Kate again?
>> >>
>> >> Dean... you troll.
>> >
>> >Well, I'd let you go on for a few months with your claim that he has a
>> >problem with it.
>> 
>> I don't recall ever claiming that. Way back when someone else told me
>> that it was 'banned' or somesuch thing. Since I get alt.snuh on altnet
>> I'm not sure what that was about.
>
>No, you kept on posting in AG that CC had a problem with it.
>
>I can dig it up, but just take my word for it.

You know how I got that impression don't you?

I have an email from him saying he didn't know what Snuh was.