🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:27:17 -0800 �
<h0plibbb_oili@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> from altnet.general wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>> 
>> "�" <h0plibbb_oili@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:3C5020BB.6BF748F0@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com...
>> > Dave Korn wrote:
>> > >
>> > > edward ohare wrote in message <3c4d5733.439290@news.alt.net>...
>> > > >On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:44:08 -0500, Kate <anonyme@meow.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >>Yes. I don't think the peeps who cancel things consider content, but
>> > > >>who knows.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >Uhhh.... yes, content is part of what they consider because the
>> > > >message must convey substantially the same message.  Now, and I'm
>> > > >laughing at this, a hipspew of irrelevant unrealated words strung
>> > > >together, each post substantially different in the words used, _does_
>> > > >convey substantially the same message, which is _there is no message_!
>> > > >Its all meaningless, in any sense of the definition of meaningless.
>> > >
>> > >   heh, yeh, I agree with that definition of why hashbuster is actually
>> all
>> > > the same.  in fact I'm willing to declare any post that is statistically
>> > > identical to noise as being noise.
>> > >
>> > > >Unless I missed it, CC hasn't said cascades were spam.  Others have
>> > > >said cascades were spam.
>> > >
>> > >   he is apparently concerned that his users should cross-poast
>> > > "responsibly".
>> > >
>> > >   and i am informed that he has a problem with some kind of apparently
>> > > unholy devil-spawned accursed creation known as 'snuh'
>> >
>> > That's news to me.
>> >
>> > Have you been listening to Kate again?
>> 
>> No Dean, I've been listening to you.  <aside: D'oh!>  I forget exactly when
>> but there was a time either last winter or the winter before when your sig
>> contained loads of stuff about how Altopia was restricting snuh in some way
>> or other, but I didn't keep notes, so will bow to your undoubtedly correcter
>> recall of the situation!
>
>Hmmm, nope, maybe what you're thinking of is the thread where I
>discussed why I changed my sig (I guess this is also how Kate came to
>that assumption).

No, that wasn't it.

>It used to have this as part of it:
>
>===
>>>>>>>>> Get Snuhy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> news:alt.snuh-made-cascades.are-the-best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> news:alt.snuh-made-cascades
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:alt.tv.simpsons.snuh
>>>>>
>>>>> news:alt.binaries.snuh
>>>>
>>>> news:alt.folklore.snuh
>>>
>>> news:alt.swnet.snuh
>>
>> news:alt.snuh
>
> http://www.geocities.com/buhsnuh
>===
>
>Chris claimed that was cascading.
>
>After calming down, I realized that he was trolling me.
>
>Which is why I think at heart he's a comedian.
>
>
>
>> 
>>           DaveK
>> --
>> moderator of
>> alt.talk.rec.soc.biz.news.comp.humanities.meow.misc.moderated.meow
>> Burn your ID card!  http://www.optional-identity.org.uk/
>> Help support the campaign, copy this into your .sig!
>> Proud Member of the Exclusive "I have been plonked by Davee because he
>> thinks I'm interesting" List Member #<insert number here>
>> Master of Many Meowing Minions
>> Holder of the exhalted PF Chang's Crab Wonton Award for kook spankage above
>> and beyond the call of hilarity.