🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <369d1b5d.90305352@BASE-ADDRESS.MCAST.NET>, Ramoth@home.net 
says...
>
>Note***
>I am changing the Subject line to better reflect the TOPIC of 
conversation in
>this thread:
>The original thread subject originated from:
>Re: Policy FAQ: cross-posting policy (updated 12/11/98):
>Threaded message Id`s are in the headers.
>
>Spiro's draft, hypocritical cunt
>
So we're talking about NT4 now are we? Suits me.

<Shrug>

Who's taking things off-topic now?


>On 19 Dec 1998 02:01:34 GMT, mr_spiro@yahoo.com (Spiro) wrote:
>
>>In article <3684ee62.13254819@BASE-ADDRESS.MCAST.NET>, 
Ramoth@home.net 
>>says...
>>>

<...>

>>>
>>All my posts are on-topic. The burden of proof lies with you to prove 
>>otherwise. If I'm such a hypocrite, it can't be that difficult to
>>find some evidence.
>>
>All will see, in your further messages to me.
>
Let's see: so far you've called me a hypocrite - supposedly for taking 
subjects off topic - so what did you do? You decided to take this 
thread...off-topic. 

But, fear not! I'm quite happy to talk about my draft (sic) 
hypocritical cunts (and I assume you are one of my new bitches).


>I am not going looking.  
>
IOW, you can't.


>It is easy to find.
>
You really think others are that interested? You're lucky I give you 
the time of day. But I don't mind leading you round by the nose.


>I just threw in a Quote YOU directed towards NT4, in
>Message-ID: <75edkp$leq$1@dosa.alt.net>
>This was quoted from the sentence where YOU, <in the guise of giving 
>"some friendly advice"> implied that HE <NT4>, was being looked on by
>other Altopian's and readers of the threads, as being a "draft,
>hypocritical cunt".
>
Three words taken from an entire post!? Funny how I seem to recall a 
complaint about things being taken out of context.


>As that statement has NO relevance towards the constructive debate of
>Altopia's Cross Posting Policy FAQ.....
>
So why is it that you feel the need to start an entirely irrelvant 
thread?


>I assumed that you would have the intelligence to see the correlation
>to the words of the quote.  The words "hypocritical cunt" were first
>used you, I also enclosed them in quotation marks, to *ensure you
>would understand the subtle correlation.
>
>I see now... NOT.
>
>This also further supports my thinking that you are just being a Troll 
>in the AG news group.  
>
You keep repeating yourself. So I'll keep repeating myself. I came here 
to talk about Altopia's AUP. That's what I was doing...until certain 
individuals, like yourself, started calling people names. Very 
juvenile.


>With the expresses intentions of creating a negative and 
>unconstructive atmosphere in the AG news group.
>
Just because you don't like my views on some aspects of the AUP, 
doesn't give you the right to subjectively arbitrate. If you wish to 
enter into meanigful discussion then do so.


>By personally attacking the originator of the message<by implying that
>NT4 is a "draft hypocritical  fuckchop">, 
>
Now you're starting to lie. You're starting to make bits of quotes up. 
What don't you post a message ID so that everybody can see where that 
quote came from?


>instead of constructively debating the contents of the message; is
>Undeniable proof of YOUR underlying, destructive intent in
>this news group. 
>
How could I single handedly destroy a newsgroup? Are you going to start 
accusing me of a denial of service attack? If you are, then you'd 
better have pretty solid proof.


>If need be, for your understanding, I can add a reference page at the
>ending of any message that are threaded from your posting.  Set up in
>the APA style of references, for easy understanding.  To reference all 
>quotes taken from any of your messages.
>
With a not inconsiderable loss of context. So there goes the 
"constructive debate".



-- 
---
Spiro
     
     
In article <36bdb702.327110520@news.classact.org>, ClassAct@skuz.net
proves he dropped out of skool before they did big words:
      
>Do I detect a certain hint of antipathy towards me?
>
No, just distaste and disgust.