🚀 go-pugleaf

Ramoth@home.net says...
>mr_spiro@yahoo.com (Spiro) wrote:
>
>*Note
>I am changing the Subject Line of this thread:
>
You're not wanting some sort of prize, are you? I mean...trained 
monkeys and all that jazz...


<...>


>If you Refuse to see that a thread is drifting off topic, within the
>constraints of the Subject line; then there is *no enlightenment
>possible for you.
>
But we weren't talking about threads drifiting off-topic, we were 
talking about what is and is not relevant to altnet.general and other 
associated newsgroups.


HTH.



>>>You took the sentence out of context.  
>>>
>>An unsubstantiated allegation. Funny how you can't post the relevant 
>>sentence. But hey, if you did, you'd be the only one taking things
>>out of context.
>
>It is *not unsubstantiated .
>
Is too!


>The relevant threads are in previous posts for all to read.
>I was talking about Altnet General specifically!
>
Oh do make your mind up. You really are the most indecisive little cunt 
I've come across lately. First, it was subject lines, next it was 
crossposting and now we've come full circle and we're back to 
altnet.general.


>I will quote snips of the messages
>^... Yours
>^>>No he's not. He's asking you to define what constitutes 
>^>>"on-topic" or "off-topic" posting, by using an example.
>^... Mine
>^>Under the context of on or off topic in a threaded message.
>^>The Subject line.
>^>I assumed that was a given.
>^>
>^>For the example of the Merry Christmas thread referenced,  
>^>if conversation starts to drift into chatter about New years 
>^>resolutions;  then the chatter is starting to get off topic, 
>^>for the thread.
>
>So...  you took that portion of my reply to Altaine.  The part you
>took out of context 
>
What bit did I take out of context?


>and used to post the message are EASILY Identifiable and located in
>the threads. You misconstrued the message of my reply to Altaine and
>then you posted this implied question to me:<begin quote> " But
>threads about Altopia's AUP (that's what I've spent my whole time here
>talking about) are definitely off-topic!?"<end quote>
>
>So...
>There is the substantion, of your taking it out of context.
>You tried to associate a thread concerning an on-topic<by subject line
>definition> discussion of merry Christmas, and say it was off-topic.
>
No, I asked you to define what is or is not on-topic for altnet.general 
- as did Antaine. It's all there in the quotes you've used. 

Not my problem if you can't fucking read.


>>>I was talking about being on topic, as in the subject of a thread.
>>>
>>No. What you did was butt into a thread claiming it was off-topic for 
>>altnet.general. 
>
>Butt in??
>HAWwwwww
>You are expecting this lame attempt to carry any weight.
>Bwaaaaa....
>Another Attempt to confuse people,  
>
Gee whizz Sherlock, lucky you set them straight.


>But it is easily discounted by simply looking at the threads.  That 
>is why I say "Lame".
>
>Since you say I never explain myself.  Well here you go..
>
>1.  Cris Caputo started this thread in it's entirety
>>Message-ID: <74rvhm$dff$0@207.14.113.2>
>2.  Class Act was next
>>Message-ID: <36729a9d.57697144@news.classact.org>
>3.  Jometien was next
>>Message-ID: <3681bb40.413866@207.14.113.10>
>4.  Jerry was next
>>Message-ID: <3673fcc4.75671244@207.14.113.10>
>5.  Flyer was next
>>Message-ID: <367600fd.8854855@news4.flyers.edu>
>6.  Class Act again
>Message-ID: <367a164c.154896078@news.classact.org>
>7.  Spiro was next
>>Message-ID: <75455n$lab$2@dosa.alt.net>
>
>This is YOUR FIRST MESSAGE in this THREAD
>In this message you posted a One Line message.  which was
><quote>
>>That is an outrageous lie, you vicious bastard.
><close quote>
>
>You were calling Class Act a vicious bastard.
>
And yet another out of context quote from you.



>You need to find some better DOGS,  Yours won't hunt anymore.
>
Deeply meaningful stuff, in the playground, I'm sure.


<...>


>>>As a message posted to all who participate in AG. With the subject
>>>of wishing them a merry Christmas.  But when the messages
>>>start to drift away from the subject, <topic> of the Thread.  
>>>Then they are Off Topic to the subject of the thread.  There is 
>>>no denying that, that is an understood, and an undisputable fact.
>>>
>>Why do you worry so much about it, when quite clearly you love 
>>participating in off-topic posts. "If thine eye offends thee, then 
>>pluck it out!"
>
>I don't worry about it??
>
Don't you know??


>Those were YOUR emotional feelings
>
I'm quite choked actually...that you could care so much. 


<...>


>Just looking at what YOU actually are posting in your messages.  Then
>letting you know, that I do not fall for your misguided, lame attempts
>to confuse people.
>
Oh I don't underestimate you powers of perception for one minute.


<...>


>>You're not losing the plot are you?
>
>Nope.
>But there is a possibility that You are. 
>



>>>I NEVER said the threads about Altopia's AUP were off topic.
>>>YOU are the one IMPLYING that I did.
>>>You are trying to make a statement that will carry no weight!
>>>IT IS NOT TRUE!
>>>
>>Temper, temper.
>
>Sorry.
>
You spineless little wretch.


>I do not get into shouting matches with people in real life. Sometimes 
>I type a word in all caps.  This is an attempt to pass along the
>fluctuation & modulation of voice, not shouting.
>
It'll sound a bit deeper once your balls drop.


>You can pull the ear plug out now.
>



>>>As such, your sentence should NOT even be debatable.  As it rests 
>>>upon Erroneous suppositions and information that has no validity.
>>>
>>I think if you trace this thread back, you'll find it was on-topic.
>
>BBBBZZZZZtttttttttt
>Wrong again.   hehehe..  This is funny really.
>
So the very first post in this thread was off-topic? 


>I will not post the info on tracing the thread back.
>I just did it in answer to one of your previous questions/statments.
>But as a refresher for others, 
>So no one will believe your statement is true!!!
>
>YOUR, oops, *Your original post into this thread was to imply Class
>Act was a "vicious bastard."
>
>Dang, Spiro.  Another Dog that will not Hunt.
>When are you going to going to realize that you are not fooling 
>anyone with your Lame attempts to misconstrue the True Facts.
>
Well maybe I should have called him a powder puff then? Would that have 
been closer to the truth.


<...>


>>>People can see what you are trying to do.  
>>>
>>You're paranoid, aren't you?
>
>No, Not paranoid, I just enjoy letting people know what you are trying
>to do.
>
I'm sure they're very appreciative of your inane drivel clogging up 
their newsgroups.


>*You should bring paranoia up????
>It has never crossed my mind.
>
So why all the fuss?


>But apparently in your mind, it does...
>
Truly you have shaken my self-confidence to its absolute foundations.



>>>Cloud the facts and trying to shift the content of your messages
>>>upon someone else in a follow up thread.
>>>
>>You must find it so difficult to cope with life. However do you
>>>manage?
>
>No difficulties at all.
>Enjoy my life, Past, Present & am sure I will enjoy the Future.
>
>Difficult to Cope with life, is crossing your mind??...
>


<...>


>>But I thought you were the smart one!?
>
>I am the smart one???
>I have never implied or said that!
>
>Again, thoughts crossing your mind.
>


>Spiro,  I truly believe that you are in need of someone to help you.
>Just look at some of the messages you are posting.  I have enclosed
>parts of some of your messages, just in this Subject line alone. I
>have enclosed them at the ending of this message.  Most of them are
>from your one line replies to people.  
>
>Usually people will speak what is on their mind.  That surmises that
>you are thinking this way consistently. 
>
>Spiro, you truly need to seek professional advice.  If not for
>yourself, then for the people around you.  I will hate to see you
>going "Postal" and hurting your loved ones or other innocent people
>around you.
>
>Mainly, I would hate to start saying "That guy went Spiro",  Instead
>of "Postal".
>
>It is apparent, you are reaching the mental point where these thoughts 
>are consuming you.  They pour out of your postings and are a cry for
>help.   
>
This is all really good stuff Ramoth. Can we have some more of it 
please?



>Here are some of your postings in this Subject line alone.
>
>Lets see what we have in this message.
>Paranoia, Coping With Life, You Were the Smart One,
>
>What do we have in other previous messages from YOU
>Outrageous Lie, Antipathy, 
>Sort Yourself Out, Fuckchops, You Really Told Me, 
>Not Setting Him a Very Good Example, 
>Lost The Argument, Daft, Hypocritical Cunt, 
>FART, You're Wrong, Mindless, Rant Deleted, 
>You Vicious Bastard, Strange That, I'll Help You Out, 
>Boo Fucking Hoo, Fuck Off, 
>I'm Such A Hypocrite,  Everything To Do With Personalities, 
>Regularly Has Schizoid Breaks From Reality, 
>
>
>Spiro,  Seek professional advice
>
>Ramoth...



-- 
---
Spiro
     
     
In article <36bdb702.327110520@news.classact.org>, ClassAct@skuz.net
proves he dropped out of skool before they did big words:
      
>Do I detect a certain hint of antipathy towards me?
>
No, just distaste and disgust.