🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <36ba6eed.111697182@BASE-ADDRESS.MCAST.NET>, Ramoth@home.net 
says...
>
>You are doing exactly as all *Know you will do,  Cross post messages
>into a news group, that has NO relevancy to the News group you are
>setting the cross posts to.  
>
You really are getting me confused with somebody else. 

I can assure you that the post is on-topic for a.f.k-m.n. It is my home 
newsgroup afterall, I should know what is correct for that newsgroup.


>You are doing so because it can be done,  Not for the reasonings, or
>purpose that it was designed for.
>
And what would they be? Why don't you tell the UseNet community; I'm 
sure they're all waiting with baited breath for your latest revelations 
on its operation.



>This further proves that you are a troll and have intents other than
>the constructive discussion of Altopia's cross posting policy.
>
Oh how a feeble little newbie struggles to grasp that which he cannot 
possibly comprehend. 



<...>


>>Who's taking things off-topic now?
>
>Changing the subject line out of the previous thread makes does not 
>in itself make the discussion off topic.
>
Your point?

<shrug>


>I changed it to what you wrote about NT4.
>
That's very helpful of you. We wouldn't want anybody confused now, 
would we?


>I felt it had relevancy to the discussion we are having.
>
>Seems as if it is on topic now.
>
Very much so, dribble dick.


<child's graffiti deleted>



>As I said,  I am not going looking.
>
The burden of proof lies with you.


>YOU *Yourself are proving My point.
>By cross posting this thread into another news group, You are proving
>that you are a troll.  
>
So everyone who posts to more than one group is a troll and everyone 
who posts to only one group is not.

Sound logic there.

Does this mean that if I don't crosspost then I'm definitely not a 
troll?


>This thread has NO relevancy for the news group that you cross posted
>it into. As such it is definitely *off topic for that particular news
>group.
>
Tell me then, if you know so much, what constitutes an on-topic post 
for a.f.k-m.n?


<...>


>hehehe...
>I changed the Subject & started a new thread in AG.
>Then posted it Only to AG news group.  
>
Aren't you the clever little chappy?


>Knowing that you would cross post your reply to the other news group.
>
Psychic too!


>Your reply is off topic for that news group now.
>
No it's not. 


>I did this, knowing that you would still set the cross post & make a
>fool of yourself.  Who led whom where??
>BBBBWWWWAAAAAhhhhhh  hahahahaha.
>
>Leading me around by the nose.  HAW...
>I led you right into here.
>
>Another Lame attempt by yourself trying to distort the true facts.
>
Wow, you must be on at least two grams a day.


<...>


>>Three words taken from an entire post!? Funny how I seem to recall a 
>>complaint about things being taken out of context.
>
>How else did YOU mean it.
>Seems pretty clear to me.
>YOU implied NT4 is a "draft, hypocritical cunt".
>
>Again, YOU are trying to shift blame.
>
He is a daft, hypocritical cunt.


BTW, why do you keep spelling daft as "draft"?


>Another DOG that will not HUNT...
>
You're at that Neuro-Linguistic Programming stuff again. Didn't you 
know, it's all self-hypnosis?



>>>As that statement has NO relevance towards the constructive debate
>>>of Altopia's Cross Posting Policy FAQ.....
>>>
>>So why is it that you feel the need to start an entirely irrelvant 
>>thread?
>
>To bring the thread and Subject line into better agreement.  To show
>more relevancy towards being on topic<for the subject line>.
>
Which, by your own admission, was Altopia's AUP. Why is it you now seek 
to discuss NT4's status as a mentally handicapped individual? 


<...>


>>Just because you don't like my views on some aspects of the AUP, 
>>doesn't give you the right to subjectively arbitrate. If you wish to 
>>enter into meanigful discussion then do so.
>
>Mummmm,  
>
Oh is she helping you with your typing?


>I still think that people who cross post messages into other groups,
>that are Not relevant messages, and are off topic messages, to the
>news group being cross posted into;  
>
Provide proof then.


So much for proof...

>Are a bunch of trolls & shit heads.
>
...there you go calling people names again. 


>Whose only purpose is to inflame and promote ill feelings for the
>participants of the news groups being effected.
>
Let's all hold hands then. 


There now, does that make you feel any better?


<...>


>>How could I single handedly destroy a newsgroup? Are you going to
>>start accusing me of a denial of service attack? 
>
>Nope,  You are putting YOUR own words into the meaning.
>Not mine.
>
So I don't intened to destroy this newsgroup then?


>You are providing NO constructive debate towards your campaign for
>change<?> of Altopia's cross posting policy.
>
I've not asked for it to be changed. I've asked for it to be clearly 
defined, in unambiguous, objective terms. 


<...>


>It further proves my thoughts that it should Not be done.
>
And you think you have a right to decide things for others? You'd 
better watch out buttfudge. It's not safe outside of your cosy little 
play-pen.


>Cross posting has its purposes, one reason it was designed and
>implemented, is for the exchange of *Relevant information between 
>news groups.
>
What bit of your *own* words don't you understand?


<...>


>>With a not inconsiderable loss of context. So there goes the 
>>"constructive debate".
>
>Nope, It would be in APA style, along with the message ID's.
>Dang,  That is one of the *Main *Reasons for having References.
>So people can easily look up the quoted text 
>No loss of context there.
>
So that's why you keep quoting isolated words out of context then!? 
That makes real sense.



>BTW, do not forget about ME leading YOU here 
>
Correction, three grams a day.


>and proving my point concerning your cross posting this thread into
>news groups, where it would be considered an off topic cross post.
>
Post proof or shut the fuck up.


You are clearly unaware of the purpose of other nwsgroups.


>I do not think you are leading me anywhere.
>
>Seek advice soon.
>You are about to self implode & go "Postal"
>
>
>Ramoth...
>
Fuckhead.



-- 
---
Spiro
     
     
In article <36bdb702.327110520@news.classact.org>, ClassAct@skuz.net
proves he dropped out of skool before they did big words:
      
>Do I detect a certain hint of antipathy towards me?
>
No, just distaste and disgust. 

========

In article <36ba6eed.111697182@BASE-ADDRESS.MCAST.NET>,
Ramoth@home.net champions intellectual debate:

You *Must have a big *Pipe.<G>
I think this fell outta yer pipe.

    ~~(�� ����>

Have to call em, slimey now.  Since `e fell outta yer britches leg.
Slimey the gerbil.