🚀 go-pugleaf

In news.admin.net-abuse.usenet none <none@nonexx.net> wrote:
: On 28 Nov 1997 13:55:36 GMT, Information Security <The@NSA.sucks>
: wrote:

: [snip]

: >Question: on the following headers (from the post this is replying to),
: >
: >   o what software / newsserver allows users to forge 'NNTP-Posting-Host'
: >
: >   o what software / newsserver allows users to forge 'Message-ID'

: Question: Which mentally deficient fascist pretends to prove his point
: by defining it to be true by using verbs like "forge" to imply what
: he's claiming to "prove"?

: Question: Why is The@NSA.sucks not "forgery"?

Who was using it?

Oh, fair enough:

   o what software / newsserver allows users to change the 'NNTP-Posting-Host'

But, the 'Message-ID' was FORGED as coming from Harvard.

: Question: Why should others be restricted because some mentally
: deficient person doesn't know how to decipher a path?

I had no problem deciphering the preloaded path: it came from alt.net.

: >I wanna know for tracking / deciphering reasons.

: You want to know for CONTROL reasons. If you want power, then earn it.
: If you want to try to take it by force or poor logic, be ready for a
: fight.

I want to know what information in the headers is reliable.

What do you mean by this: "If you want power, then earn it."

You got a problem with me asking questions?
---guy

   Fuhgeddaboutit.