🚀 go-pugleaf

Peter Hucker wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:19:24 -0000, George G <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com> wrote in
>> news:op.t8dwr4kd4buhsv@fx62:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:31:03 -0000, George G
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote in
>>>> news:1ie5uv1.krcdhztc02xzN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk:
>>>>
>>>>> George G <invali@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Black Dragon <bd@nomail.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>> news:fs0h23$2gsq$1@bdhi.local:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > George G wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> I've seen many a perfectly good newsgroup ruined by your
>>>>>> >> customers thanks to that policy.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > People who set cross posts to irrelevant newsgroups are
>>>>>> > far more responsible for noise on Usenet than a few nym
>>>>>> > shifters are. One of those people are in fact you.
>>>>>> > Congratulations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> uk.net.news.config is not an irrelevant newsgroup as many
>>>>>> NGs in the uk hierarchy have fallen victim to Altopia
>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was completely irrelevant to your rant against an
>>>>> individual (Chris Caputo) and your post is most definitely
>>>>> off-topic here since it has nothing to do with the
>>>>> configuration of the uk hierarchy.
>>>>
>>>> It wasn't a rant, it was a statement of fact. Strictly
>>>> speaking it is probably off-topic; however, off-topic posts
>>>> account for a large proportion of unnc.
>>>>
>>>>> (Follow-ups set to altnet.general)
>>>>
>>>> Follow-ups reset. Anyone replying to this post can remove
>>>> unnc if they chose to.
>>>
>>> I propose the news server strips the "follow-up" header.  If
>>> you want to change the groups it goes to, then do so in the
>>> newsgroups header, people should not be able to post to one
>>> set, and have replies go elsewhere.  It's childish.
>>
>> Take it up with Steve Firth.
> 
> For some reason I can't see Steve's posts....

You have to be a member of the Inner Circle.
-- 
ah