Re: this group

Article View: amiga.general

Article #118

#118

From: Brian Wallace
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00

15 lines
1391 bytes

'We' have it because it was picked early on and thus still exists. Generally
you are better off on comp.sys.amiga.misc or whatever, but amiga and
amiga.general still exist and at present always will (unless news groups
change in the future sometime).
Chris Young <unsatisfactory@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:3768412D.MD-1.3.unsatisfactory@bigfoot.com...
> Just out of interest, why do we have a top-level hierarchy for
> the Amiga?  Surely comp.sys.amiga.#? would do?  Or is there a reason
> for this? (created by AI?)
>
> Chris
> --
> Unsatisfactory Software - "because it is"
> http://www.unsatisfactory.freeserve.co.uk
> ICQ:28784166

Technical Details

Message-ID: <IOga3.163$yE1.17943@monger.newsread.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3768412D.MD-1.3.unsatisfactory@bigfoot.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10844a,4897a3371a120094
X-Google-Attributes: gid10844a,public
From: "Brian Wallace" <bcw142@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: this group
Date: 1999/06/18
Message-ID: <IOga3.163$yE1.17943@monger.newsread.com>
X-Deja-AN: 490886726
References: <3768412D.MD-1.3.unsatisfactory@bigfoot.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role <abuse@inr.net>, We Care <abuse@newsread.com>
X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 929667368 216.64.66.88 (Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:56:08 EDT)
Organization: InterNet Resource NETworks (inr.net)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:56:08 EDT
Newsgroups: amiga.general

Reply to Parent Message