Re: Verr�ckt = weiblich?

Article View: at.blackbox.profil.feedback

Article #3

Back to at.blackbox.profil.feedback Previous Next

From: Michael M. Resch
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 00:00

10 lines
842 bytes


Daniela Kranz <Daniela.Kranz@blackbox.at> schrieb im Beitrag
<msg1287451.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at>...
> aber mit "eventuell meint sie..." l�sst sich sowieso alles
> reininterpretieren.

man sollt sie halt fragen.

michael (MiR)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01bec9e3$b487f240$090e4581@pcgnt1>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<msg1285742.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at> <01bec898$e2557c70$090e4581@pcgnt1> <msg1286372.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at> <01bec930$84b61050$090e4581@pcgnt1> <msg1287451.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: GERMAN,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 11436a,7c3b55c9a4013456
X-Google-Attributes: gid11436a,public
From: "Michael M. Resch" <resch@hlrs.de>
Subject: Re: Verr�ckt = weiblich?
Date: 1999/07/09
Message-ID: <01bec9e3$b487f240$090e4581@pcgnt1>
X-Deja-AN: 499017622
References: <msg1285742.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at> <01bec898$e2557c70$090e4581@pcgnt1> <msg1286372.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at> <01bec930$84b61050$090e4581@pcgnt1> <msg1287451.thr-bef77e.2dc6e4@blackbox.at>
Organization: Black*Box Wien - http://www.blackbox.at/
Newsgroups: at.blackbox.profil.feedback

Reply to Parent Message