Article View: at.mail.behindert
Article #264Latimer (fwd)
From: Gregor Wolbring
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00
62 lines
3416 bytes
3416 bytes
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 15:06:11 -0700 (MST) From: Gregor Wolbring <gwolbrin@acs.ucalgary.ca> To: letters@theherald.southam.ca Subject: Latimer Letter to the Editor The Calgary Herald Dear Editor: Re: 3rd. December 1997. Experts shrug off criticism of ruling (Calgary Herald) I would like to comment on the following "Despite dire warnings from disabled groups about the consequences of the Robert Latimer decision, expert says it will have little effect on the way the legal system handles future cases." 'It's going to be a cold day in hell before we have the next constitutional exemption claim for mercy killing' said Prof. Alan Young of Osgoode Hall law school in Toronto. That's because most of these cases are proceeded upon as manslaughter cases which don't have the inflexible harsh sentencing regime'". We never indicated that there might be a floodgate of constitutional exemptions for murder. We believe that we will see an increase in so called 'mercy killing' cases. The justification for 'mercy killing' will be pain relief. This argument has been strengthened by the fact that the judge said pain relief, and not disability, was the issue in the case. We see and will see more of the practice that 'mercy killers' are just charged wth manslaughter. The fact that the law of the land has often been circumvented by the laying of lesser charges, such as manslaughter, when murder has clearly committed against disabled persons is outrageous and should be abhorrent to those who love democracy. We will see more parents murdering their disabled child for the 'good' of their disabled child. We will see more people murdering other people in the name of pain relief. We will see an increased demand for changing the law to allow a category of 'compassionate homicide'. This is the immediate fallout from the Latimer case. Increasingly, disability is associated with low quality of life and a life not worth living. This way of looking at disability is at the core of the sympathy for Latimer as well as at the increased demand for technology which can predict and prevent persons with disabilities being born. We are going down the slippery slope from supporting as a society self-determined assisted suicide to involuntary euthanasia. Under these circumstances, I, a citizen with a disability, can't expect to be treated as a Canadian citizen without disability. Despite Charter guarantees of our equal protection of the law we are treated as second class, if not lower, citizens with no rights of equality before and under the law and in society. That is today's reality after the sentencing of Latimer. Sincerely Dr. Gregor Wolbring Member Human Rights Committee Council of Canadians with Disabilities University of Calgary phone 2205448
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.A41.3.96.971203164935.34572B-100000@acs5.acs.ucalgary.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103d3c,af6fdd0d1a650bb1,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103d3c,public From: gwolbrin@acs.ucalgary.ca (Gregor Wolbring) Subject: Latimer (fwd) Date: 1997/12/04 Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96.971203164935.34572B-100000@acs5.acs.ucalgary.ca> X-Deja-AN: 295008804 Sender: daemon@osiris.wu-wien.ac.at Reply-To: behindert@olymp.wu-wien.ac.at Organization: WU-Wien News Gate: behindert@olymp.wu-wien.ac.at to at.mail.behindert by usenet@wu-wien.ac.at Newsgroups: at.mail.behindert