🚀 go-pugleaf

Clayton E. Cramer <clayton_cramer@hotmail.com>
wrote in article <35CB6C5C.947DD377@hotmail.com>...
> And wrote:

> > > ]Children killed by firearms: 1995
> > > ]    0 - Japan
> > > ]   19 - Great Britain
> > > ]   57 - Germany
> > > ]  109 - France
> > > ]  153 - Canada
> > > ]  260 - Texas

> > > What are the ages of these children, btw?

> > What is the difference, btw.

> > So what if one country is 18, another 19?

> > Glorious god's country US is still hundreds
> > of times worse than anywhere else, btw.

> If the "children" includes 19 year olds in the U.S. but
> only 16 year olds in other countries, that significantly
> distorts the numbers.  Remember that 16-19 is where a
> LOT of murderers and robbers in this country are --
> and not surprisingly, a lot of them don't survive, either
> being shot by their victims, or their competitors in the
> "urban self-employed mobile pharmaceutical trade," or
> even their fellow partners in crime.

> Of course, the U.S. rate (that is, adjusted for population)
> isn't so impressive.  Remember that the U.S. is by far
> the largest population country on the list.

I have no idea who inserted 16. The discussion elsewhere
centred on, everyone knowing the population of enough of
the countries to do their own per 100,000, what happened
to Switzerland and Jamaica and my favourite from Knauer,
I refuse to discuss it, at 19 they are not children.