🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: att.wireless
Article #3

[Fwd: Variable E.M. Field Strengths]

#3
From: Joe Vrankovic
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 00:00
61 lines
2970 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



--------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from altweb.ott.igs.net [206.248.16.26] by mail.idigital.net with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-4.02) id A5EC7D0106; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:51:24 EST5EDT
Received: from beachnet.org (ve3ied.beachnet.org [204.225.64.66])
	by altweb.ott.igs.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA10513
	for <va3vis@rac.ca>; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:47:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tfmcs.org ([204.225.64.56]) by beachnet.org with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #7) id m0xtgzD-0000jTC; Sat, 17 Jan 98 17:45 EST
Message-ID: <34C128D7.76975FC2@tfmcs.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 16:55:35 -0500
From: Lyman Gifford <ve3beg@tfmcs.org>
Organization: Toronto FM Communications Society, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Vrankovic <va3vis@rac.ca>
Subject: Re: Variable E.M. Field Strengths
References: <34C045BA.2C6680BC@rac.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Joe, how much fluctuation? RF at those freqs  mentioned (circa 850MHz) is
susceptible to atmospherics, ie absorption by precipitation, wet leaves,
passing bodies..are you noting momentary or consistent average
fluctuations? I am sure the ionosphere has nothing to do with it. Thanks
for the CC
cheers, Lyman

Joe Vrankovic wrote:

> Has anyone noticed EMF fluctuations at ~34cm on the signal strength
> meter of a cellular phone?  I have observed that at different times of
> the day, the signal strength may vary.  Would this have anything to do
> with solar flux activity?  I know that solar flux activity affects HF.
> I can't come up with any ideas because we are not talking great
> distances here between the base station and the mobile unit.
>
> Suggestions anyone?

--
Lyman Gifford, ve3beg@tfmcs.org    Packet: VE3BEG@VA3BBS
Pres. Toronto FM Communications Society, editor TFM NewsLetter
TFMCS: PO Box 427, Station A, Willowdale, ON M2N 5T1
Membership: Randy Wallace ve3ins@tfmcs.org (416) 283-0621





--------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC--
Technical Details
Message-ID: <34C156AA.C636301D@rac.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd7bb,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd7bb,public
X-Google-Thread: ffd09,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidffd09,public
X-Google-Thread: fb049,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb049,public
From: Joe Vrankovic <va3vis@rac.ca>
Subject: [Fwd: Variable E.M. Field Strengths]
Date: 1998/01/17
Message-ID: <34C156AA.C636301D@rac.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 316956079
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC"
Organization: Skyscape Communications/Fastlane
Newsgroups: att.wireless,alt.cellular.tech,alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf