Article View: att.wireless
Article #3[Fwd: Variable E.M. Field Strengths]
From: Joe Vrankovic
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 00:00
61 lines
2970 bytes
2970 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from altweb.ott.igs.net [206.248.16.26] by mail.idigital.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.02) id A5EC7D0106; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:51:24 EST5EDT Received: from beachnet.org (ve3ied.beachnet.org [204.225.64.66]) by altweb.ott.igs.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA10513 for <va3vis@rac.ca>; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:47:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from tfmcs.org ([204.225.64.56]) by beachnet.org with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #7) id m0xtgzD-0000jTC; Sat, 17 Jan 98 17:45 EST Message-ID: <34C128D7.76975FC2@tfmcs.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 16:55:35 -0500 From: Lyman Gifford <ve3beg@tfmcs.org> Organization: Toronto FM Communications Society, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Vrankovic <va3vis@rac.ca> Subject: Re: Variable E.M. Field Strengths References: <34C045BA.2C6680BC@rac.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joe, how much fluctuation? RF at those freqs mentioned (circa 850MHz) is susceptible to atmospherics, ie absorption by precipitation, wet leaves, passing bodies..are you noting momentary or consistent average fluctuations? I am sure the ionosphere has nothing to do with it. Thanks for the CC cheers, Lyman Joe Vrankovic wrote: > Has anyone noticed EMF fluctuations at ~34cm on the signal strength > meter of a cellular phone? I have observed that at different times of > the day, the signal strength may vary. Would this have anything to do > with solar flux activity? I know that solar flux activity affects HF. > I can't come up with any ideas because we are not talking great > distances here between the base station and the mobile unit. > > Suggestions anyone? -- Lyman Gifford, ve3beg@tfmcs.org Packet: VE3BEG@VA3BBS Pres. Toronto FM Communications Society, editor TFM NewsLetter TFMCS: PO Box 427, Station A, Willowdale, ON M2N 5T1 Membership: Randy Wallace ve3ins@tfmcs.org (416) 283-0621 --------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34C156AA.C636301D@rac.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd7bb,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd7bb,public X-Google-Thread: ffd09,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start X-Google-Attributes: gidffd09,public X-Google-Thread: fb049,d8db29d1fb2d5bea,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb049,public From: Joe Vrankovic <va3vis@rac.ca> Subject: [Fwd: Variable E.M. Field Strengths] Date: 1998/01/17 Message-ID: <34C156AA.C636301D@rac.ca> X-Deja-AN: 316956079 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------BF45AD2C39414F651D2FA9EC" Organization: Skyscape Communications/Fastlane Newsgroups: att.wireless,alt.cellular.tech,alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf