🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1igqfaINNi90@flash.pax.tpa.com.au> dclunie@pax.tpa.com.au (David Clunie) writes:

>Now, to help to bring you back to reality: why don't you ask some women 
>that you know - of any socio-economic class - if, for the same money, they 
>would rather be topless barmaids or porn stars, than what they do now.

Why don't you ask them if they would rather collect radioactive isotopes from
the bottom of a mine shaft filled with natural gas and be paid the same money?
Perhaps it's something they just don't want to do.  I mean, if you wanted to do
something, and you knew that you would get paid more to do it than what you're
currently being paid, then that's what you'd be doing.  (Unless your morality
forbids it and/or you're hung up about what society, family or friends would
think, in which case you'd answer "no" anyway).  Why don't you instead ask some
topless barmaids or prostitutes whether they'd rather be doing something else
_that_they're_qualified_for_ for the same pay.  Why don't you ask some factory
workers or shop assistants whether they'd rather be doing something else
_that_they're_qualified_for_ for the same pay.  My bet is that some would
say yes, some would say no, and some would say "I don't have any choice in
the matter, I can't find another job".  And it is that last simple economic
reality which forces women to become topless-barmaids or prostitutes, not
sexual exploitation.

james