🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan20.084614.11293@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>,
tcl@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au (Charles Layton ) wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that the best way to solve the recurrent requests for
> various banned newsgroups is to for some site to import them independant
> of the current link.  If the GIF groups were not included this could
> be done for a relatively small cost.  All that is needed is
> 	(1) a site to do it
> 	(2) a small contribution from everyone who has expressed a desire
> 		for one of these groups
> 	(3) organisation - probably the hardest bit.
> 
> Bingo, no more Censorchip.

You missed by far the most important - a commitmant by the AARNet
administration that a site that imports these groups via another link will
be allowed to redistribute the groups on to AARNet.  Last I heard on the
subject was that any site that did this could face having their link to
AARNet removed (I don't know how that fits with Pyramid importing and
distributing the alt.drugs group).

Peter or Geoff, care to comment on the AARNet-legality of the scheme?
   Peter.

_______________________________________________________________________
Peter N Lewis <peter@cujo.curtin.edu.au>             Ph: +61 9 368 2055