🚀 go-pugleaf

}tcl@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au (Charles Layton ) writes:
}>carol@ee.uts.edu.au (Carol Gibson) writes:
}>>What I want to know is - who banned alt.sexual.abuse.recovery?
}>>(Apparently it got lumped in with all the other alt.sex newsgroups -
}>>which is an entireley inappropriate generalisation). Who does one
}>>have to lobby to get this ban revoked?

}>It seems to me that the best way to solve the recurrent requests for
}>various banned newsgroups is to for some site to import them independant
}>of the current link.  If the GIF groups were not included this could
}>be done for a relatively small cost.  All that is needed is
}>	(1) a site to do it
}>	(2) a small contribution from everyone who has expressed a desire
}>		for one of these groups
}>	(3) organisation - probably the hardest bit.

Regardless -- this is still not addressing the original question. 
alt.sexual.abuse.recovery hardly falls within the category of the alt.sex
hierarchy -- where is the group being cut off, and why? What can be done
to actually get groups like this into the country again?

--

  -Colin Panisset *:^)                         | "CTBCPP (Clay Tablet By 
         {panissec|colinp}@nms.otca.oz.au      |  Carrier Pigeon Protocol),
                                     So There. |  defined in RFC-39127"