🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by The Womp Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:57
Govt to explore Google 'safe harbour'
#211
Author: The Womp
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:57
63 lines
3744 bytes
Govt to explore Google 'safe harbour'

Liam Tung, ZDNet.com.au
Source:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Govt-to-explore-Google-safe-harbour-/0,130061791,339297413,00.htm?feed=rss

The Safe Harbour scheme, at the centre of the Australian Federation
Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) case against internet service provider
iiNet, may be extended to Google and Yahoo.

"The Australian Government will consider whether the scope of the safe
harbour scheme should be expanded to include additional types of
online service providers," the Department of Broadband Communications
and the Digital Economy's Future Directions paper released yesterday.

The scheme was introduced in 2004 under the Australia-United States
Free Trade Agreement and was designed to encourage ISPs and telcos to
cooperate with copyright owners to deter infringement by reducing the
potential liability of providers if they assist copyright owners'
efforts to prevent infringements via, for example, file-sharing.

The scheme is also at the centre of the legal battle between AFACT and
iiNet, with AFACT arguing that the ISP failed to alert its customers
to acts of copyright infringement.

The paper has not outlined a time frame for the review or defined what
type of online service providers might be brought under the scheme.

The consultation paper on which the Future Directions paper was based
asked stakeholders whether the scheme should be broadened; whether
Australia's copyright law limited internet services; and whether any
non-copyright law created uncertainty.

Responses that were handed to the government earlier this year fell
along expected lines. Google and Yahoo had argued in their submissions
that the provision should be expanded to their operations, while the
International Intellectual Property Alliance, the Australian
Performing Right Association, the Australian Recording Industry
Association and the Australian Publishers Association argued strongly
against expansion.

Google argued that its inability to use safe harbours was inconsistent
with provisions in the US and New Zealand, and said it was at a
disadvantage to ISPs and telcos in Australia that can use it as a
defence. It also argued its exclusion from the scheme may prevent
further investments in Australia.

"Google submits that a lack of safe harbour will be highlighted as a
serious potential risk factor � potentially making Australia a less
attractive venue to set up business," Google Australia's head of
government and regulatory affairs Carolyn Dalton wrote in the
company's submission.

Telstra's Sensis similarly argued for the expansion of the provision
to remove uncertainty over how it deals with counterfeit products sold
on its web service.

-- 
Clean Feed, it "cleans" the Internet in the same way that Ethnic
Cleansing "cleanses" the population.

http://filtermenot.googlepages.com/home
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads