🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.comms.mobile
Article #106169

Re: mobile coverage problem?

#106169
From: Rod Speed
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:00
38 lines
3013 bytes
Two Bob <forcefield@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:67Vl4.233$iH5.6017@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...

>>>>>> Telstra *will* fix it, or they will release me
>>>>>> from my mobile contract. It's that simple.

>>>>> Actually they don't have to release you from your contract.

>>>> Now's probably the best time to test it. Little Johnny has just
>>>> been on a tour of the bush promising his government wouldn't
>>>> shut down any more services to the bush. I don't think Telstra
>>>> will want any negative publicity about holding people to contracts
>>>> when they can't fulfill their end of the (implied) offer.

>>> This contract is a GSM contract. Maybe there would
>>> be a chance with cdma, but no chance with GSM.

>> Depends entirely on what promises were made by
>> some stupid sales droid at the time of sale, McGoon.

> Nothing to do with promises,

Sure is. If some stupid salesdroid is silly enough to tell the
customer that coverage is absolutely certain to be excellent
at his home, after being told where it is, and it turns out to be
complete crap, you are entitled to a full refund. Thats the law.

> they have already swapped CDMA customers on contract over to GSM.

Sure, but thats a different issue to the general claim McGoon made.

> Not all, but probably the ones who scream the loudest.

Same thing happens in the situation where some stupid salesdroid
makes a complete silly statement. Yes, its normally the most demanding
and those who know what the law says that get a full refund. Plenty
of others get fobbed off by complete bullshit about contracts.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <879qdf$agg$1@news1.mpx.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3889f738$0$26374@motown.iinet.net.au> <Vhvi4.8716$3b6.40748@ozemail.com.au> <7jcp8s82gkond0etq895m0473efpuo9oqk@4ax.com> <Crjj4.10437$3b6.49219@ozemail.com.au> <l1ds8s8aufv2ftp0asifaic902pgff1mef@4ax.com> <388f9fdd@info-int> <949108040.596666@draal.apex.net.au> <949120016.187260@draal.apex.net.au> <Hvzk4.1713$VJ1.2948@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <949203088.61771@draal.apex.net.au> <3pj79scv7th8migauto9j0qttvh8an1md6@4ax.com> <9led9s043lcdt7nuilvl3bub8jrvu2li71@4ax.com> <pthe9sk4dvc7afam1ib982akqh8ln4niha@4ax.com> <8785uf$o1j$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <67Vl4.233$iH5.6017@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb718,5761a04ccf12237e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public
X-Google-Thread: f77fd,5761a04ccf12237e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf77fd,public
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,eaf73ee41d0d750f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public
From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: mobile coverage problem?
Date: 2000/02/03
Message-ID: <879qdf$agg$1@news1.mpx.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 580880399
References: <3889f738$0$26374@motown.iinet.net.au> <Vhvi4.8716$3b6.40748@ozemail.com.au> <7jcp8s82gkond0etq895m0473efpuo9oqk@4ax.com> <Crjj4.10437$3b6.49219@ozemail.com.au> <l1ds8s8aufv2ftp0asifaic902pgff1mef@4ax.com> <388f9fdd@info-int> <949108040.596666@draal.apex.net.au> <949120016.187260@draal.apex.net.au> <Hvzk4.1713$VJ1.2948@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <949203088.61771@draal.apex.net.au> <3pj79scv7th8migauto9j0qttvh8an1md6@4ax.com> <9led9s043lcdt7nuilvl3bub8jrvu2li71@4ax.com> <pthe9sk4dvc7afam1ib982akqh8ln4niha@4ax.com> <8785uf$o1j$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <67Vl4.233$iH5.6017@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Complaints-To: abuse@optusnet.com.au
X-Trace: news1.mpx.com.au 949513455 10768 198.142.214.81 (2 Feb 2000 17:44:15 GMT)
Organization: The Grunge
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Feb 2000 17:44:15 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile,canb.general,aus.general