🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.comms.mobile
Article #106194

Re: mobile coverage problem?

#106194
From: ant
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:00
49 lines
3278 bytes
Thomas Raven wrote in message
<7jcp8s82gkond0etq895m0473efpuo9oqk@4ax.com>...
>On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:54:14 +1100, "ant" <dont-look@evil.spam> wrote:
>
>>
>>Rob wrote in message <3889f738$0$26374@motown.iinet.net.au>...
>>>> fine, good coverage and signal strength. telstras base station
placement
>>>Dont voda pay for the use of teltras base stations?
>>>
>>
>>
>>only in some areas, and only after the ACCC forced them to share towers
>>where possible. the obviously dont here in wollongong as my vodaphone
>>account gets good digital indoors and yet my friends telstra phone cant
>>hold a call inside the house. tried swapping sim cards with him and its
>>defiantly the service provider not he phone as the same situation
applied,
>>had to go outside to use the telstra account regardless of which phone it
>>was in.
>>
>>but both of the nearest telstra base stations are built at their
exchanges
>>at corrimal and thirroul, both of them are next to primary schools and
>>close to ridges that obscure the line of sight to the transmitters for a
>>large are of the suburbs that they are supposed to serve. i am only three
>>KM from the corrimal base station but it is on the other side of the hill
>>and is totally blocked by it. vodaphone on the other hand put its base
>>station half way up the escarpment and have good coverage over a much
>>larger area from one base station then telstra gets with three.
>
>But that does mean that Vodaphone's capacity is less. If they ever
>sign up more subscribers then you're going to have problems getting
>and maintaining a connection in that area because there is only one
>tower.


then they put up another one or two towers and make the cells smaller, as
the area that it serves is about 15 KM long by about 4Km wide i dont think
that they are going to need more capacity for a while yet. still better
then telstras service in the area. i would rather have good signal from one
base station then bad signal from three. telstra had promised(over a year
and a half ago) to move their base station up onto the escarpment but
nothing ever happened, probably to busy with the CDMA roll out, all those
poor rural subscribers.


ant
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Crjj4.10437$3b6.49219@ozemail.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3886536d@info-int> <3886e6c4.1440231@newshost.pcug.org.au> <zvpunryyvtugsbbgpnaonhhtbetnh.foo0wn0.pminews@newshost.tip.net.au> <388787b7@info-int> <eBgi4.8306$3b6.38615@ozemail.com.au> <3889f738$0$26374@motown.iinet.net.au> <Vhvi4.8716$3b6.40748@ozemail.com.au> <7jcp8s82gkond0etq895m0473efpuo9oqk@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,eaf73ee41d0d750f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public
X-Google-Thread: fb718,5761a04ccf12237e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public
X-Google-Thread: f77fd,5761a04ccf12237e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf77fd,public
From: "ant" <dont-look@evil.spam>
Subject: Re: mobile coverage problem?
Date: 2000/01/26
Message-ID: <Crjj4.10437$3b6.49219@ozemail.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 577421761
Distribution: world
References: <3886536d@info-int> <3886e6c4.1440231@newshost.pcug.org.au> <zvpunryyvtugsbbgpnaonhhtbetnh.foo0wn0.pminews@newshost.tip.net.au> <388787b7@info-int> <eBgi4.8306$3b6.38615@ozemail.com.au> <3889f738$0$26374@motown.iinet.net.au> <Vhvi4.8716$3b6.40748@ozemail.com.au> <7jcp8s82gkond0etq895m0473efpuo9oqk@4ax.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 948814690 203.108.231.35 (Wed, 26 Jan 2000 02:38:10 EST)
Organization: anthill
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 02:38:10 EST
Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile,canb.general,aus.general