Article View: aus.comms.mobile
Article #658Re: "SEND TEXT AS EMAIL" option
From: Rod Speed
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 21:59
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 21:59
54 lines
3033 bytes
3033 bytes
John Henderson wrote > John Savage wrote >> In the SEND TEXT options of the Nokia, I've never used the >> SEND TEXT AS EMAIL option. I hesitate to try it in case I >> get price shock in the next bill, and I've never seen anyone >> talk about the facility. Is it functional on most networks? > No, and certainly not operational in Australia. I see that among > the international implementations was "Vodafone:m@il", and it > lasted only a few years. > If you search for that, keep it in quotes to retain the > significance of the ":" and "@" characters. >> Can it be expected "to just work" out of the box, or does it need >> to set up for the particular network or provider? > Vodafone:m@il needed to be set up with a subscription paid > for incoming email-to-SMS traffic. The email address of the > destination phone was <mobile-number>@vodafone.net>. There were plenty that were free and needed no setup. http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/email-to-sms/http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/email-to-sms/ What out, that url crashes IE8 spectacularly. > A google search for "SMS to email" might find some operators > still offering the service. > There was one in the UK which was free in the SMS -> email > direction, and I used them on a few occasions. I've since lost > the number, and they'd stick an advert for somebody into the > email in lieu of its being user-pays. > The text format was as per GSM 03.40: > [<to-email-address><space>]<message> >> Is it the same cost as a standard SMS? Always? >> Does the email address get counted in the 160 chars? > Yes and yes (at least in the case of the one-way service I used), > bearing in mind that international SMSs are generally dearer > than national these days. >> Is delivery likely to be more reliable than sending the message as an >> SMS to an overseas destination? I figure that once the message hits >> the internet, it stands an excellent chance of being delivered, >> whereas SMS seems to require a myriad of individual network >> agreements and two-way SMS between specific phones is far from >> guaranteed. > Agreed.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<94fttqFssmU1@mid.individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<1105100000052.10May11$rookswood@suburbian.com> <94fqtjF6fmU1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb718,f2c77efef8410f34 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid5e83424db6,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile Subject: Re: "SEND TEXT AS EMAIL" option Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:59:20 +1000 Lines: 56 Message-ID: <94fttqFssmU1@mid.individual.net> References: <1105100000052.10May11$rookswood@suburbian.com> <94fqtjF6fmU1@mid.individual.net> X-Trace: individual.net 87PB6fsPMOCwPsgN+5uXHw0NpA5wTtThr41RwN2hpjaVNIxb8= Cancel-Lock: sha1:CiNVQRakcHiqKkWXPDp4Hmxhuxg= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original