Re: Vodafone coverage Melbourne-Echuca/Moama

Article View: aus.comms.mobile

Article #893

#893

From: Frank Slootweg
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:22

12 lines
1402 bytes

Liron <nomail@sick.of.getting.spam> wrote:
[...]
> Is this the experience of other people, or could my phone have problems with 
> 2G?  My main gripe is that the coverage I experienced does not match the 
> coverage as displayed on the Vodafone website.

  For coverage outside the cities and larger towns, there's just one
option, Telstra NextG, period. Everything else is a (bad) joke.

  As a traveller (from The Netherlands), I put up for several years with
Vodafone GSM and Telstra GSM, but finally bit the bullet and went
Telstra NextG and am a happy chappy ever since.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8cv2m0F3dvU1@mid.individual.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail

References: <ur5ao.3702$Yv.2788@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fb718,878b7618273bf93d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid5e83424db6,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile
Subject: Re: Vodafone coverage Melbourne-Echuca/Moama
Date: 17 Aug 2010 09:22:08 GMT
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <8cv2m0F3dvU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ur5ao.3702$Yv.2788@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>
X-Trace: individual.net r5oXJIh3jxUfZpafC/u5nA73p0wGhHZWIz/eRtco4vnJu1U86L
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ofHrezFR6o4lUyDaXS77nOPCLaw=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.0/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2

Reply to Parent Message