Article View: aus.comms.videocon
Article #292Re: Videoconferencing Systems
From: Keshav Bhat
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
13 lines
1132 bytes
1132 bytes
Or www.vtel.com for that matter? Everyone in the industry (clients, I mean) are waiting for the 'dust to settle' on this issue before they jump into the ring. Wonder what will signal that a technological plateau has been reached and propel the decision making process? Michael Lowery wrote in message <35B29138.27A240B7@TTLC.NET>... >I searched newsgroups on the subject of videoconferencing >and was amazed at the lack of both information and >interest. Has anyone looked at the Objective Communications >system (http://www.objectivecom.com) and compared it with >systems from PictureTel (http://www.pictel.com). Can we get >some discussion going here.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6p0u31$6e$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<35B29138.27A240B7@TTLC.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101647,4f88ccfb13c28f83 X-Google-Attributes: gid101647,public From: "Keshav Bhat" <bhateyes@ihug.co.nz> Subject: Re: Videoconferencing Systems Date: 1998/07/22 Message-ID: <6p0u31$6e$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz> X-Deja-AN: 373371082 References: <35B29138.27A240B7@TTLC.NET> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: The Internet Group Ltd Newsgroups: aus.comms.videocon