🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #480

Re: help wanted re Jbuilder

#480
From: Dave Bird
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00
51 lines
3067 bytes
In article <uZJA5.60133$c5.166398@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>, Derek
<NO_SPAMdcrookes@bigpond.com> writes
>Hi All,
>I am evaluating Jbuilder for possible use......and would like some
>advice....
>
>The manual suggests that Jbuilder, could be used to build any application,
>i.e. it seems to suggest that once could use it instead of Delphi or C++
>etc..
>
>What would be the benefit/drawbacks of designing commercial quality apps
>with Jbuilder, as opposed to say Delphi or C++ or others.


 There are a number of development systems for different languages
 which allow you to build graphical user interfaces by drag and drop,
 including visual C++/CBuilder,  visual Java/Jbuilder, visual Basic,
 and visual Pascal/"Delphi".


 The advantage of basic is that it's simpler than the others to get
 into, but it's clunky and less powerful and less easy to get things
 done once you've learned it. There are no advantages at all to Pascal: 
 if you want a dinosaur, buy a brontosaurus. VBasic is like Cobol, there
 is an awful lot of software written in it and never rewritten even 
 though it's naff. Pascal is like RPG: **somebody** somewhere has a 
 load of legacy software in Pascal and won't let go, even though
 it's gutwrenchingly awful even to contemplate the stuff.

 The important ones are Java and C++, where the comparison goes....


 Java is intermediate code, it will always be slower than C++; C++
 always gives ultimate speed. Since it is intermediate code, Java is
 very portable between many machines and operating systems; C++ isn't
 in practice.  You can write the same app between different machines,
 but you'll mess around endlessly trying make it actually work on them.

 C++ is that bit more powerful and that bit harder to learn. C++ lets
 you do anything but that means it lets you make mistakes, and bad or
 unfinished C++ programs are murder for stuff like memory leaks; Java
 is more restrictive, but protects you from many errors and crashes.
 Java deals with the issue of classes better and more cleanly.  Java is
 definitely the nicer one to program in, though you may be less pleased
 with the ultimate performance of the result on your particular machine.
 


-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses
Technical Details
Message-ID: <RfGmCUBpl405EwfS@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <uZJA5.60133$c5.166398@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,d302eae212557b4f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,d302eae212557b4f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Dave Bird <dave@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: help wanted re Jbuilder
Date: 2000/09/28
Message-ID: <RfGmCUBpl405EwfS@xemu.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 675367946
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
References: <uZJA5.60133$c5.166398@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 970194306 nnrp-03:11894 NO-IDENT xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
Organization: none
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,borland.public.jbuilder.java.language