🚀 go-pugleaf

should it not read Java = = c+++

:)


"Richard Blackman" <richard@tsm.com.au> wrote in message
news:8fnv2r$c0t$1@enyo.uwa.edu.au...
> heh
> i totally agree
> with both of you
>
> hehe ;)
> Alan Boldock <aboldock@camtech.net.au> wrote in message
> news:V1wT4.28686$PL4.578439@ozemail.com.au...
> > Maybe it should be
> > Java = C+++
> >
> > they say born-again-Java programmers (ie C++ programmers who have seen
the
> > light)
> > are the most critical!
> >
> > perhaps in aus.computers.JAVA we should say
> >
> > VB = C-1E-99  !!
> >
> > sorry MS lovers!
> >
> >
> >
> > "Paul Murray" <pmurray@nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message
> > news:RdtT4.11008$X4.22212@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > > > I think what he was trying to say
> > > > was
> > > > that it is
> > > > c-- (decremental c)
> > > > as opposed to
> > > > C++ (incremental c)
> > > >
> > > > in other words he was saying java is crap
> > >
> > > I think he was specifically trying to say that java is just a lame
> version
> > > of C. I was trying to say that Java is not C and isn't trying to be.
> Java
> > is
> > > for different things.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>