Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #770Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
From: CHANDRASEKHAR JAKKAMPUDI
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:00
57 lines
2935 bytes
2935 bytes
Look under jdk1.2.2\bin on Windows. All the executables including javac, javap, java etc are right there. If you do not find them there I think you need to re-install. If you are not able to call javac from your console, it might mean that your path may not be set correctly. Try to compile by going to the jdk1.2.2\bin directly. If you can do this, this confirms that your Path is not correclty set. Douglas Garstang <doug@pobox.com> wrote in message news:CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > Ken, > > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a 'dir > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing. > *sighs* > > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes) > > Regards > Douglas. > > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com... > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"? I have downloaded the > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as the > > Windows implementation. > > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I just downloaded and installed: > > > > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98. > > > > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included. > > > > > > There isn't!!! > > > > > > *very stressed* > > > > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler! > > > > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time? > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Douglas > > > doug@pobox.com > > > > -- > > Ken Wilson > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is > > irrelevant > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming') > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8d9uof$c13g$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public From: "CHANDRASEKHAR JAKKAMPUDI" <jakkampudi@prodigy.net> Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ??? Date: 2000/04/15 Message-ID: <8d9uof$c13g$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> X-Deja-AN: 611521812 References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Priority: 3 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com 955809359 4192340 209.254.218.83 (15 Apr 2000 14:35:59 GMT) Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Apr 2000 14:35:59 GMT Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer