Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #772Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
From: Chuck McCorvey
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:00
56 lines
2805 bytes
2805 bytes
The install creates a c:\jdk1.2.2\bin directory by default. I have installed this multiple times and it always puts it there. I just downloaded an installed (after cleaning out a previous install) the same file. The javac and other executables are located in C:\jdk1.2.2\bin as they should be. I've never seen this fail. Perhaps you did something wrong? Chuck McCorvey Douglas Garstang wrote: > > Ken, > > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a 'dir > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing. > *sighs* > > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes) > > Regards > Douglas. > > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com... > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"? I have downloaded the > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as the > > Windows implementation. > > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I just downloaded and installed: > > > > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98. > > > > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included. > > > > > > There isn't!!! > > > > > > *very stressed* > > > > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler! > > > > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time? > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Douglas > > > doug@pobox.com > > > > -- > > Ken Wilson > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is > > irrelevant > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public From: Chuck McCorvey <chuckm@solutionware.com> Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ??? Date: 2000/04/15 Message-ID: <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com> X-Deja-AN: 611527536 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news.rdc1.va.home.com 955810612 24.7.181.200 (Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:56:52 PDT) Organization: Creative SolutionWare, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:56:52 PDT Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer