🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #784

Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???

#784
From: Abdul Malik
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:00
66 lines
3086 bytes
Please download again, and reinstall, defintely u'll get it
Douglas Garstang wrote in message ...
>I definitely do not have a javac in my BIN directory!
>
>Chuck McCorvey <chuckm@solutionware.com> wrote in message
>news:38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com...
>> The install creates a c:\jdk1.2.2\bin directory by default.  I have
>> installed this multiple times and it always puts it there.
>>
>> I just downloaded an installed (after cleaning out a previous install)
>> the same file.   The javac and other executables are located in
>> C:\jdk1.2.2\bin as they should be.  I've never seen this fail.  Perhaps
>> you did something wrong?
>>
>> Chuck McCorvey
>>
>> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> >
>> > Ken,
>> >
>> > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a
>'dir
>> > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing.
>> > *sighs*
>> >
>> > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes)
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Douglas.
>> >
>> > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>> > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com...
>> > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"?  I have downloaded the
>> > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as
the
>> > > Windows implementation.
>> > >
>> > > Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > All,
>> > > >
>> > > > I just downloaded and installed:
>> > > >
>> > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98.
>> > > >
>> > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included.
>> > > >
>> > > > There isn't!!!
>> > > >
>> > > > *very stressed*
>> > > >
>> > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler!
>> > > >
>> > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks and Regards
>> > > > Douglas
>> > > > doug@pobox.com
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ken Wilson
>> > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is
>> > > irrelevant
>> > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <38fa69a8.0@news-svr.tp.ac.sg>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com> <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public
From: "Abdul Malik" <abdulm@tp.edu.sg>
Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
Date: 2000/04/17
Message-ID: <38fa69a8.0@news-svr.tp.ac.sg>
X-Deja-AN: 612055855
References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com> <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
X-Trace: 17 Apr 2000 09:55:38 +0800, 152.226.64.160
Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700