Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #784Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
From: Abdul Malik
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:00
66 lines
3086 bytes
3086 bytes
Please download again, and reinstall, defintely u'll get it Douglas Garstang wrote in message ... >I definitely do not have a javac in my BIN directory! > >Chuck McCorvey <chuckm@solutionware.com> wrote in message >news:38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com... >> The install creates a c:\jdk1.2.2\bin directory by default. I have >> installed this multiple times and it always puts it there. >> >> I just downloaded an installed (after cleaning out a previous install) >> the same file. The javac and other executables are located in >> C:\jdk1.2.2\bin as they should be. I've never seen this fail. Perhaps >> you did something wrong? >> >> Chuck McCorvey >> >> Douglas Garstang wrote: >> > >> > Ken, >> > >> > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a >'dir >> > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing. >> > *sighs* >> > >> > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes) >> > >> > Regards >> > Douglas. >> > >> > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message >> > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com... >> > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"? I have downloaded the >> > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as the >> > > Windows implementation. >> > > >> > > Douglas Garstang wrote: >> > > > >> > > > All, >> > > > >> > > > I just downloaded and installed: >> > > > >> > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98. >> > > > >> > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included. >> > > > >> > > > There isn't!!! >> > > > >> > > > *very stressed* >> > > > >> > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler! >> > > > >> > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks and Regards >> > > > Douglas >> > > > doug@pobox.com >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Ken Wilson >> > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is >> > > irrelevant >> > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming') > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<38fa69a8.0@news-svr.tp.ac.sg>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com> <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public From: "Abdul Malik" <abdulm@tp.edu.sg> Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ??? Date: 2000/04/17 Message-ID: <38fa69a8.0@news-svr.tp.ac.sg> X-Deja-AN: 612055855 References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com> <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Trace: 17 Apr 2000 09:55:38 +0800, 152.226.64.160 Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700