Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #279Re: Dual processors ?
From: Floyd Davidson
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 19:11
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 19:11
37 lines
2948 bytes
2948 bytes
George Bell <MasterofTimeADim@netscape.net> wrote: >Floyd Davidson wrote: >> >> Mine were not exactly expensive... I watched ebay for awhile, and bought >> used 9mb SCSI2 lvd drives. Something like $30 each... > >But don't you need a special SCSI raid controller and aren't they real The Tyan S2462UNG motherboard has dual SCSI2 LVD controllers on board, and that works just fine with the Linux software raid. >expensive? I saw one at a website for about $500. Can you somehow >implement raid 5 with more than one ordinary SCSI controller(As you can >see I'm a newbie when it comes to SCSI, and I'm thinking of trying it out). Yep, and it isn't even really very hard either, though booting from a RAID array is a bit complex. Two controllers are better than one, but even with just one you'll get some improvement. I don't remember the specifics, but basically for an individual motherboard, you want enough SCSI controllers to be able to flood the PCI bus. Then you want to put enough hard disks on each SCSI controller to be able to flood each SCSI bus . For example, if the SCSI bus will do 80Mb/s max there is no point in putting 4 80Mb/s drives on it! But 2 40Mb/s drives or 4 20Mb/s drives will show a significant improvement over just one, and the results will be the same as an 80Mb/s drive. You want to find out what kind of bandwidth your motherboard can deal with, and then choose controllers to match. Then choose disks. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.ptialaska.net/~floyd> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<87adifv2cz.fld@barrow.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews2References:
<pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <av578p$c8s17$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de> <av5qtf$tcf$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <fbf82913.0301040421.1a35bdfa@posting.google.com> <87of6w7ump.fld@barrow.com> <pan.2003.01.05.05.14.18.890697.1189@optusnet.com.au> <871y3s58hj.fld@barrow.com> <pan.2003.01.05.10.12.52.480107.1189@optusnet.com.au> <87wuljvb46.fld@barrow.com> <3E1872E3.7020809@netscape.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114381,acfea8e5e9ff6f15 X-Google-Attributes: gid114381,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,acfea8e5e9ff6f15 X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,acfea8e5e9ff6f15 X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-05 11:35:54 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews2 From: Floyd Davidson <floyd@ptialaska.net> Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,aus.ads.forsale.computers.used Subject: Re: Dual processors ? Date: 05 Jan 2003 10:11:08 -0900 Organization: __________ Lines: 37 Sender: floyd@barrow.com Message-ID: <87adifv2cz.fld@barrow.com> References: <pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <av578p$c8s17$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de> <av5qtf$tcf$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <fbf82913.0301040421.1a35bdfa@posting.google.com> <87of6w7ump.fld@barrow.com> <pan.2003.01.05.05.14.18.890697.1189@optusnet.com.au> <871y3s58hj.fld@barrow.com> <pan.2003.01.05.10.12.52.480107.1189@optusnet.com.au> <87wuljvb46.fld@barrow.com> <3E1872E3.7020809@netscape.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-493.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: gnus 5.8.3/XEmacs 21.1.9/Linux