🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #281

Re: Dual processors ?

#281
From: William Park
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:10
31 lines
2667 bytes
In comp.os.linux.hardware George Bell <MasterofTimeADim@netscape.net>
wrote:
> Dieu Phan wrote:
> 
>> hi, please give me a hint.  question: which dual processors's
>> motherboard which can install 2 XP Athlon 1800+ and it is compatible
>> with rh80? its model & price as well?  --- Dieu
>> Phan_____________________________________________________ Make your
>> life as simple as "Moonlight Sonata" of L. Beethoven
>> 
> 
> You know, I considered a dual processor board at one point.  My
> conclusion is that unless your running a busy webserver or something
> critical like this, its just not worth it.  I think a better
> philosophy is to have one CPU, and choose peripheral devices of higher
> quality(graphics,ethernet,sound,etc.) - that can act as busmasters
> without CPU support.  So then the processing gets distributed around
> the mobo.  Also you'd probably see more performance increase from a
> IDE raid system than from dual processors, and IDE raid has really
> come down in price.  Also, processing speed is so high now that
> advantage of dual is not as great.

I also have all dual-SMP machines.  That's because I know what I'm
doing.  If OP has to ask in Usenet group, then my advice is go with
single-CPU.  It's cheaper, and he won't notice the difference.  Spend
the money on quality case, power supply, quality memory, one IDE
harddisk (Seagate/IBM) per cable, or SCSI, ...

-- 
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
Linux solution for data management and processing. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <avaaft$dcprt$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.CA!not-for-mail
References: <pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <3E178508.6040208@netscape.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114381,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid114381,public
X-Google-Thread: 102983,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-05 14:10:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.CA!not-for-mail
From: William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,aus.ads.forsale.computers.used
Subject: Re: Dual processors ?
Date: 5 Jan 2003 22:10:06 GMT
Organization: Open Geometry Consulting
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <avaaft$dcprt$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de>
References: <pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <3E178508.6040208@netscape.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.ca (64.56.232.6)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1041804606 14051197 64.56.232.6 (16 [99293])
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020130 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686))