Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #281Re: Dual processors ?
From: William Park
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:10
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:10
31 lines
2667 bytes
2667 bytes
In comp.os.linux.hardware George Bell <MasterofTimeADim@netscape.net> wrote: > Dieu Phan wrote: > >> hi, please give me a hint. question: which dual processors's >> motherboard which can install 2 XP Athlon 1800+ and it is compatible >> with rh80? its model & price as well? --- Dieu >> Phan_____________________________________________________ Make your >> life as simple as "Moonlight Sonata" of L. Beethoven >> > > You know, I considered a dual processor board at one point. My > conclusion is that unless your running a busy webserver or something > critical like this, its just not worth it. I think a better > philosophy is to have one CPU, and choose peripheral devices of higher > quality(graphics,ethernet,sound,etc.) - that can act as busmasters > without CPU support. So then the processing gets distributed around > the mobo. Also you'd probably see more performance increase from a > IDE raid system than from dual processors, and IDE raid has really > come down in price. Also, processing speed is so high now that > advantage of dual is not as great. I also have all dual-SMP machines. That's because I know what I'm doing. If OP has to ask in Usenet group, then my advice is go with single-CPU. It's cheaper, and he won't notice the difference. Spend the money on quality case, power supply, quality memory, one IDE harddisk (Seagate/IBM) per cable, or SCSI, ... -- William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <opengeometry@yahoo.ca> Linux solution for data management and processing.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<avaaft$dcprt$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.CA!not-for-mailReferences:
<pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <3E178508.6040208@netscape.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114381,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid114381,public
X-Google-Thread: 102983,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,acfea8e5e9ff6f15
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-05 14:10:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.CA!not-for-mail
From: William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,aus.ads.forsale.computers.used
Subject: Re: Dual processors ?
Date: 5 Jan 2003 22:10:06 GMT
Organization: Open Geometry Consulting
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <avaaft$dcprt$1@ID-99293.news.dfncis.de>
References: <pan.2003.01.03.13.58.10.249319@iprimus.com.au> <3E178508.6040208@netscape.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-3m-b2-6.highspeed.eol.ca (64.56.232.6)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1041804606 14051197 64.56.232.6 (16 [99293])
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020130 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686))