Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #390Re: Software groups warn of FTA dangers
From: _
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:38
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:38
81 lines
3488 bytes
3488 bytes
Rod Speed wrote: >>>>said the effects would be felt by all developers, not >>>>merely those who worked with open source software. > > >>>Complete and utter pack of lies. > > >>Rod you are completely wrong. > > > We'll see... Rod it affects us now, regardless of the FTA changes. The guy's statement is correct. Developers are affected by s/w patents. Simple. Given that many developers market their s/w to places where such patents are in place and can be enforced it affects us. > Complete and utter pack of lies. Come on, you're smarter than that. > Soorree, nothing like what that fuckwit claimed. I wasn't referring to his claims but yours. >>but as mentioned we are to minimise any differences > > > Just waffle, fuckwit. To quote yourself, we'll see. > Nope. And nothing like that fool claimed. I agree it won't be anything like the alarmists say but we'll likely get some change. Anyway I'm part of the crowd that will benefit so what do I care? >>>>He said huge software houses had the resources to obtain patents. > > >>>And most dont bother, even in the US system, fool. > > >>Rubbish. You obviously don't follow it closely enough. > > > Even you should be able to bullshit your way out of > your predicament better than that puerile shit, child. Just look at the US PTO grants. You'll be able to find them. Check the "assignee" field. Do some counting. Go back about ten years and compare the numbers. The s/w patent game is wide open and many know how to play it. >>Quote (again from the FTA guide mentioned above) >>in reference to section 17.4.7 of the FTA, > > >> "Implementation of this Article will require legislative change. >> The nature and extent of those changes need to be carefully >> explored. Article 17.12 provides that Australia has a two year >> period from the date of entry into force of the Agreement to >> implement its obligations under this provision." > > > We've ALREADY done our own, fuckwit. I've read it. > And no FTA gets to force particular legislation here anyway. Can you read? /giving up (yeah, got for it).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4114b124$0$29782$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<pan.2004.08.07.02.14.57.592603@dodo.com.au> <2nj1o9F1csgmU1@uni-berlin.de> <4114a7f4$0$4754$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2njoidF19d20U1@uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 102983,d7c8ce5ece357c16 X-Google-Thread: 102c27,d7c8ce5ece357c16 X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,d7c8ce5ece357c16 X-Google-Thread: 108c83,d7c8ce5ece357c16 X-Google-Thread: fd95d,d7c8ce5ece357c16 X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,gid102c27,gid10df0c,gid108c83,gidfd95d,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:38:27 +1000 From: _ <_@_._> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Macintosh/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,aus.legal,aus.politics,aus.computers,aus.censorship Subject: Re: Software groups warn of FTA dangers References: <pan.2004.08.07.02.14.57.592603@dodo.com.au> <2nj1o9F1csgmU1@uni-berlin.de> <4114a7f4$0$4754$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2njoidF19d20U1@uni-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <2njoidF19d20U1@uni-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 81 Message-ID: <4114b124$0$29782$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.30.122.33 X-Trace: 1091875108 29782 211.30.122.33