🚀 go-pugleaf

"Bill Unruh" <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message news:cf6chf$hik$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>
> ]Bill Unruh <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote in
> ]message news:cf669q$fau$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca...
> ]> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> writes
>
> ]>>    Each Party shall endeavour to reduce differences in law
> ]>>    and practice between their respective systems, including
> ]>>    in respect of differences in determining the rights to an
> ]>>    invention, the prior art effect of applications for patents,
>
> ]>> and even someone as stupid as you should be able to grasp
> ]>> that does NOT say that WE have to follow the US approach.
> ]>> Why dont THEY have to follow OUR approach instead ?
>
> ]> Uh, Said the elephant to the mouse-- lets agree that we
> ]> both should go along the same road. Now they reach a
> ]> fork in the road. The elephant wants to go one way, the
> ]> mouse the other. Which direction do you think they take?
>
> ]Which part of 'Each Party' are you having problems with ?

> Which part of the disparity in size and clout are you haveing problems with?

Doesnt even get a mention in the FTA, stupid.

> I am from Canada. We have agreements with the USA as well. The most recent
> is softwood lumber. Despite the Free Trade resolution mechanism declaring time
> and again that the US has no case, the US continues to levy duties.

Completely irrelevant to the question being discussed,
what is mentioned in that 'shall endeavour' bit.

Its just bureaucratic waffle in reality.