Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #47166Re: Partition ID problem.
From: Richard RUDEK
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:00
23 lines
1257 bytes
1257 bytes
Regit Young <regit@wantree.com.au> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Recently when I did a fdisk, I realised that I have wrong entries in the
>partition table. ie.
>/dev/sda3 ....
>/dev/sda4 ....
>
>without sda1 and sda2 ??
>
>I'm interested to know how to solve this, even more interested to know
>what cause it. Any suggestions are deeply appreciated.
What problem. There's no hard and defined rule that states partitions have
to be allocated from partition 1 upwards. In fact MSDOS traditionally used
what's considered partition 4 in Linux, first.
Note Zip disks also seem to use partition 4.
__ __ _______________________________
//)) //)) | Richard RUDEK. MicroDek. | Hey, it's Friday night...
//\\ //\\ | Chatswood, Sydney. Australia. | C:\WORK> CD \
`-------------------------------'
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36a001c2.10263020@news.zeta.org.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<369F1B3F.9519EAB@wantree.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,4da22d3764385afc X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: x@invalid.zeta.org.au (Richard RUDEK) Subject: Re: Partition ID problem. Date: 1999/01/16 Message-ID: <36a001c2.10263020@news.zeta.org.au> X-Deja-AN: 433279928 References: <369F1B3F.9519EAB@wantree.com.au> Organization: Zeta Internet, http://www.zeta.org.au/ Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux