🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #47166

Re: Partition ID problem.

#47166
From: Richard RUDEK
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:00
23 lines
1257 bytes
Regit Young <regit@wantree.com.au> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Recently when I did a fdisk, I realised that I have wrong entries in the
>partition table. ie.
>/dev/sda3 ....
>/dev/sda4 ....
>
>without sda1 and sda2 ??
>
>I'm interested to know how to solve this, even more interested to know
>what cause it. Any suggestions are deeply appreciated.

What problem. There's no hard and defined rule that states partitions have
to be allocated from partition 1 upwards. In fact MSDOS traditionally used
what's considered partition 4 in Linux, first. 

Note Zip disks also seem to use partition 4.
  __   __   _______________________________
 //)) //)) | Richard RUDEK. MicroDek.      | Hey, it's Friday night...
//\\ //\\  | Chatswood, Sydney. Australia. | C:\WORK> CD \  
           `-------------------------------'
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36a001c2.10263020@news.zeta.org.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <369F1B3F.9519EAB@wantree.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,4da22d3764385afc
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: x@invalid.zeta.org.au (Richard RUDEK)
Subject: Re: Partition ID problem.
Date: 1999/01/16
Message-ID: <36a001c2.10263020@news.zeta.org.au>
X-Deja-AN: 433279928
References: <369F1B3F.9519EAB@wantree.com.au>
Organization: Zeta Internet, http://www.zeta.org.au/
Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux